回来了。 哈哈。好多人的名字都没听过,就挑着R选。
我知道我要挨板子。但罗姆尼上台打仗的可能性更大。打仗是刺激经济最快捷的方式啊。 run~~~~~~~~~
voting with war possiblity in mind! I am going for Ron Paul
The trillion-dollare figure does not, for example, include long-term health care for veterans, thousands of whom have suffered crippling wounds, or the interest payments on the money borrowed by the Federal Government to fund the war.
I am not sure, I don't like either of those big twos. I will check the waiting line when I go home from work.
What is the base? War was adding to our national debt, somebody else made himself and his friend very rich instead. American can't be strong with only the troops.
family background and connections are much more important than academic merits
Clinton was on very small scale, not much loss in US side. I wonder who made money from those arms and ammunition here, but everybody who paid tax paid for those wars!
exactly!
Question is who got the money? why so much addtion to our national debt?
maybe tomorrow morning, even a couple of days later, it depends
point is the small people, you and me, do not benefit from it, and they are spending money from our pockets!
We are talking about wars, not selling ammunitions only!
中国卖武器是政府挣钱吧。。美国是军火商自个挣钱
We are not 军火商, and we are paying the wars for so many years, the lossing battles.
How is that comparing with our ever jumping national debt?
polling center close at 8pm here, the best scenario for the result is later tonight.
一个导弹过去就赢那种可以打打,10年8年的真不知道想干嘛
Re!
please read more before you make this kind of comments.
US made a fortune by joining those wars very late, they sell ammunitions to everyone at first.
现在不是二战时期了。。打仗是积累资本了,给资本家,而不是国家财政