以下是引用nofeelingx在2007-9-29 14:30:00的发言：
按我的理解，平信是不能加bubble的。厚度不能超过限制吧。这样的话还能怎么个好好包装啊？

若是你事先就觉得小样应该是个小管子小瓶子之类的东西，那就更不该选择这个平信了。

我指的好好包装是按照买家所谓的加bubble之类的说的。可是明显卖主没有这么想啊。卖主想的就是包个厚点的纸就可以了，所以提供了平信这个option。

maya....then it is seller's misunderstanding, because based on exchange board record, the way she did is not "好好包装".... i am not saying that she did it purposely, but saying that she didn't do enough research before she began a skin care post, and after buyers told her the reason that caused the problem, she didn't think it was her fault...

两个对于“好好包装”的定义不同么。
that is true, but obviously, the general way of "好好包装" is the one that buyer thought......

而且买家在投诉卖主没有好好包装之外，还外带着说了没想到小样是这样纸质的，应该是小管子之类的。所以我才在后面说“既然都这么想了还选平信”。
again... even with 平信, bubble should also be used if it is still allowed.....then it will be no problem with 小管子.... if bubble is not allowed by usps after the policy changed, the seller could communicate with buyer.If the buyer still wanted to use 平信 without bubble, then it is the buyer's fault for any damage...

如果买家以为所以为的平信option就是first class加bubble的，那么只收一块钱真的是太便宜了。也许是我少见多怪吧。反正在paypal打印的话，都是1.13起的（不加dc不另加信封钱）