发帖回复
查看:3293|回复:43
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

有人用过paypal的这个功能转过钱吗?

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
09-12-13 05:21操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣
以下是引用lishaqueen在12/13/2009 2:29:00 AM的发言:
这个广告 说了等于没说 大家别这么单纯给PAYPAL 骗了好不?

PAYPAL 本来SEND 任何MONEY 都是FREE 因为PAYPAL FEE 只是跟收款人收 所以付款人 绝对是FREE TO SEND

还有 下面的那些费用 说什么FUNDED BY CREDIT CARD 才收费 也就是 两边都要收 付款人收手续 收款人收手续

大家看看PAYPAL 新的POLICY 。收款人跟付款人的手续 都分别写了。 付款人大部分时间都是FREE TO SEND MONEY。 收款人 是要看他账户的类型

还有 你觉得PAYPAL 干嘛要搞这么多类型的PERSONAL PAYMENT TYPE 。。 有GIFT 有PERSONAL PAYMENT OWED ? 以前没有CHANGE POLICY 的时候 没这么多选项的。
多了选项 就是为了方便拦截各位的钱 锁各位的账户 然后钱拿不出来 就等于 你给他们免费存定期让他们去投资了。

还有 PAYPAL 为什么要所有PAYMENT 类型都能打印LABEL 也就是为了方便给他们留证据 以后锁你账户 或者永久不让你用PERSONAL PAYMENT TYPE 他们好赚手续费。

PAYPAL 最黑了 大家还是早点远离

 


paypal isn't a nice company. however, further categorizing payment type may not be motivated as what you think. According to legistlation passed last year, paypal will soon be required to generate income tax forms for paypal account owners. To differentiate what is income and what is not income, paypal has to further categorize payments.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/12/13 5:22:10编辑过]

头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
09-12-13 09:08操作
查看全部AA分享
以下是引用smlcoco01在12/13/2009 8:39:00 AM的发言:

看上去挺黑啊.


paypal isn't nice because it is not profitable. However, afterall, paypal's this move to finer categorization of payments, I think, is more relevant to newly passed legislation to require paypal to generate income tax forms. Do you want your rent payment to your roommate to be counted as her income? If paypal doesn't effectively differentiate, I am afraid they would have to count everything as income, especially when the legistlation allows paypal to count all payments to a paypal account as income.


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/12/13 9:14:04编辑过]

Advertisement
发帖回复
查看:3293|回复:43
  • 1
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回