发帖
查看:9551|回复:35
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

门外就是战场,我们自己的安全要考我们自己来守卫,枪杆子里面出安全

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
20-06-01 17:04操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣

弱弱地问一句,这样自行设路障会不会有麻烦?

头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
20-06-01 17:22操作
查看全部AA分享

那就看你觉得设路障麻烦,还是让riots 畅行无阻更麻烦?


ezsmiling 发表于 2020-06-01 17:16

我说的麻烦,是法律上允许吗?毕竟路是公共场所。

Advertisement
头像
0操作3 #
头像
3 #
0
20-06-01 17:37操作
查看全部AA分享

Antifa制造暴乱去的哪个地方不是公共场所,你给指出来?敢情你光拿法律要求良民啊


芝士年糕 发表于 2020-06-01 17:28

我问个自己不懂的问题,怎么成了要求别人了?依法保护自己,免得秋后算账。

头像
1操作4 #
头像
4 #
1
20-06-01 18:30操作
查看全部AA分享

我们一年交了30%+的税去哪了,居然要靠自己保护自己,where is the cop?


pizzawithnut 发表于 2020-06-01 17:36

Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html


POLICE HAVE NO DUTY TO PROTECT YOU, FEDERAL COURT AFFIRMS YET AGAIN

https://mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-you-federal-court-affirms-yet-again



“Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur,” said Darren L. Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. “Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.”

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody,” he pointed out.

发帖回复
查看:9551|回复:35
  • 1
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回