一个文明，一个野蛮，中美之争就是文明和野蛮之争

kwirky 发表于 2021-06-06 14:33

如何界定文明和野蛮？美国主动挑起或参与的与他国交战有多少？中国有相同举动没？假借谎言无视联合国决议入侵伊拉克的是哪国？

47楼层主的第二张图好像是稻城亚丁，谷歌图片显示的

https://images.app.goo.gl/LFGW63nANd4XUkf19

西藏林芝

https://images.app.goo.gl/zbnBvt33ku359Agm9

美国实际上被公推为世界警察，也做过坏事，但是不仅在国外，在国内也有反对声音强烈公开批判。所以不在于犯不犯错误，而在于公众可以批判监督，不至于错事走太远。比如你一个外国人，可以不停地在这个美国论坛骂美国。这就是文明与野蛮的重大差别之一。

有个细节问你一下，“无视联合国决议”是什么决议？

noshock 发表于 2021-06-06 19:04

层主英语没问题吧？维基的有关你问的联合国决议

Legality of the Iraq War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_the_Iraq_War#Resolutions_related_to_First_Persian_Gulf_War_and_also_the_2003_invasion

Resolutions related to First Persian Gulf War and also the 2003 invasion[edit]

As part of the 1991 Gulf War ceasefire agreement, the Iraqi government agreed to UN Security Council Resolution 687, which called for weapons inspectors to search locations in Iraq for chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, as well as weapons that exceed an effective distance of 150 kilometres.^[37] After the passing of resolution 687, thirteen additional resolutions (699, 707, 715, 949, 1051, 1060, 1115, 1134, 1137, 1154, 1194, 1205, 1284) were passed by the Security Council reaffirming the continuation of inspections, or citing Iraq's failure to comply fully with them.^[38] On September 9, 1998, the Security Council passed Resolution 1194, which unanimously condemns Iraq's suspension of cooperation with UNSCOM. One month later, on October 31, Iraq officially declares it will cease all forms of interaction with UNSCOM.^[39]

United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 (1990) and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (1991), repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 (1991), and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949 (1994).

The commission of inquiry of the government of the Netherlands found that the UN resolution of the 1990s provided no authority for the invasion.^[36]

回复 92楼mouton的帖子

你好像很会编辑！UN 的决议两种不同解释意见都有。你就只列一种。做人要正派诚实。如果你英语很差，就应该先学好英语再辩论。

On March 17, 2003, the Attorney General for England and Wales Lord Goldsmith agreed that the use of force against Iraq was justified by resolution 1441, in combination with the earlier resolutions 678 and 687.^[34]

According to an independent commission of inquiry set up by the government of the Netherlands, UN resolution 1441 "cannot reasonably be interpreted as authorising individual member states to use military force to compel Iraq to comply with the Security Council''''s resolutions。

顺便说一下，中国好朋友，美国的布什发动的错误战争受到美国人民广泛反对，我们也都签名强烈反对。

noshock 发表于 2021-06-06 20:23

首先，那位层主问的是有关联合国决议，不是对决议解释的两种不同意见，维基词条里列了具体决议。

其次，有关美英无视联合国决议，联合入侵伊拉克，当时其他国家已经表达意见，你自己可以查来看，既然英国是入侵国之一，你认为其所属体系的所谓解释属于独立第三方吗？