发帖
查看:23791|回复:67
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

3333333~~~

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
16-03-20 13:07操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣
回复 [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=1988309&postid=71141939#71141939]2楼红豆菠萝的帖子[/url]

有paper啊,但是基本上都带上了A当第3作者啥的。我老公之前就是很敬仰他,而且还有中国人的尊师情结。。。就算A啥没干,之前发的都还是带上他的。另外有个现象就是在做presentation的时候,同一句话,我老公说出来就没人理,但A说出来,别人就信,认为是对的。
我的第一个马甲 发表于 3/20/2016 12:54:56 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=1988309&postid=71142045#71142045][/url]
If the work was supported by the PI's funds, naturally the PI had the right to authorship. In the same token, the work was the intellectual property of the PI's institute IF it was supported by the PI's funds and subcontracted to your husband.
头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
16-03-20 13:18操作
查看全部AA分享
Your husband should consult with the office of research integrity of your husband's university for suggestions. A critical question is: was this big cow the corresponding author of those papers that published the "code"?
Advertisement
头像
0操作3 #
头像
3 #
0
16-03-20 13:49操作
查看全部AA分享
回复 [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=1988309&postid=71142144#71142144]14楼猪生苦短的帖子[/url]

MM是懂法律方面的吗?但是这个code的研发,经历的近10年,期间的subcontact也是用各个阶段的code
在做成模型,这个改怎么claim呢?而且现在他们是要把这个code拿去,做一个我老公没有任何关系的项目。
我的第一个马甲 发表于 3/20/2016 1:15:45 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=1988309&postid=71142225#71142225][/url]

MM, it seems to me that the code by no means is your husband's own IP. It could be a three-way split among your husband, his institute, and the PI's institute, depending on the situation. So he definitely needs to consult with the ORI. But the key here is what your husband wants to achieve through legal actions?
Does he just want to keep the code so he can use it to apply for funds as the PI in the future? Does he want to be part of that major project?
发帖回复
查看:23791|回复:67
  • 1
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回