这个最终问题是在于，我也许是 unsexual / un-novelty compared to ppl here，and there probably nothing I can do about it。

回复 5楼tidewater的帖子

开一个冷淡看性版，聊量子物理😄

xinchina 发表于 2021-01-19 14:49

Maybe that will work.

不过我留一句话在这里，我不知道 prevalence for sure，也不知道 taxonomy 是不是跟 ACTN3 unmutated 以及 AMY1 unduplicated 的存在相关性。Just maybe, maybe, for a small group, it is not SM, neither woman on top, or vocalize sex like opera. Maybe it all about the simulated Hunter Gatherer chasing and tackle game, not on 100 meter dash, but on the bed. The Gatherer do not want move aggressively, in order to avoid any possibility of injury... Just maybe.

回复 8楼tidewater的帖子

我还是喜欢听班花校花的故事～～

ChristinaW 发表于 2021-01-19 14:56

That part is gone Haha ，，，

回复 8楼tidewater的帖子

有没有可能就是自己选择的一个persona

xinchina 发表于 2021-01-19 14:57

I am not sure. But it could be like this, most of my life journeys do not really have choices.

That is partly due to I was usually given the opportunities for trial, and I usually took advantage of them, and even run data science on outcomes.

回复 8楼tidewater的帖子

有没有可能就是自己选择的一个persona

xinchina 发表于 2021-01-19 14:57

Also I can give you one data point on the outcome data science. I cannot rule out biases though.

I removed music, change the way of thrusting to be more "Hunter-Gatherer" game like. Other variables unchanged. And use low setting steady vibrator instead of wave mode, to avoid distraction.

The outcome is more wet, similar tightness, shorter duration which not from male side.

I did it carefully to avoid any possible discomfort.

But you don’t need trust my data. It is certainly biased.

回复 12楼tidewater的帖子

如果人生可以回去重新设计，可以任你选择，你会选择一个更sexual 的persona吗

xinchina 发表于 2021-01-19 15:11

No, I won't.

回复 16楼tidewater的帖子

既然不会，为什么要找那么多science去证明呢，你存在，即是合理啊。

xinchina 发表于 2021-01-19 15:23

Prove beyond reasonable doubt.

Hard science theories are always refutable.

Unrefutable is considered soft science, or, belief.

回复 20楼tidewater的帖子

如果hardscience 认为你的这个subgroup不合理，难道你就改变自己的style吗？

xinchina 发表于 2021-01-19 15:33

Hard science do not remove my potential capabilities to do math, or give me potential capabilities to be a basketball player.

Hard science help me to better find who am I.

回复 20楼tidewater的帖子

如果hardscience 认为你的这个subgroup不合理，难道你就改变自己的style吗？

xinchina 发表于 2021-01-19 15:33

更正一下，觉得按一般统计的定义(按 PiV sex frequency 和 duration 算)，我应该属于 high sex drive，虽然属于相当 vanilla sex 的一族。

这个网站对 sex drive 和 sex awaken 的定义(包括 implicit 的定义)，我觉得有比较严重的 cognitive bias 。也比较偏向 language arts 而不是 data science 。

这是所谓心理学砖家们最大的 cognitive bias 了 。。。 所有的理论引用都正确，只是要求人在卧室做贵妇、在客厅做荡妇 。。。

主要是说在这个匿名玩玩的论坛换位思考 。。。 这就好比打射击类电玩游戏时，把游戏当成真实世界 。。。 这属于一种精神疾病叫做 schizophrenia，得治。