[转帖]孙维发表了第二次声明！-第1页

ratzinger

0操作1 ^#

以下是引用fivezerozero在2006-1-13 17:43:00的发言：

她的家庭背景强，那个朱令家庭背景也很强，而且有着强烈的观点sw就是凶手，为何sw还是“逍遥法外”？

还有，你怀疑她只是申明没有做，那又有啥证据呢？

Details?????????????????

ratzinger

0操作2 ^#

[em02] [em02] [em02] [em02] [em02] [em02] [em02] [em02] [em02] [em02] [em02]

There's no end for this discussion.

ratzinger

0操作3 ^#

以下是引用butterflycc在2006-1-14 23:33:00的发言：

mm，你可以仔细看看前面的帖子。不要什么东西都要别人给你重复两次。

作者把物化2班，理解成1班，2班中的2班。

但是实际上物化2班，指的是92级物化专业。

比如清华建筑94，是3个班，大家都称他们建4。

没有真正是清华建筑94出来的人，会说自己是4班的？都是自称4字班，或者建4。要么就建41，建42，建43。明白了么？

But 物化2 only had one class. I would still call them "物化2班" now I know the naming convention. [em10] [em10] [em10] [em10] Don't you call students this 班 and that 班????

ratzinger

0操作4 ^#

But for this case of poisoning, the one who commited it really had to know this substance very well. Chemistry is my major and I only knew its name until I read this case.

There are poisons that would kill right way, but this one has a very slow effect, which is exactly he/she wanted. I'm not an expert of poisons, but how many people would use this one??? And to understand how it works?

Maybe I should have studied Inorganic Chemistry very carefully.