回复 [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808337#83808337]1楼Caffeine的帖子[/url]
期待已久的好消息终于来了!!!
本来就是应对伊波拉的药,指望它完全对症新冠从来就不现实。短期内没别的药,先拉上顶着而已,好歹比用于应对艾滋病的克利芝感觉离新冠近些
galezhang 发表于 4/29/2020 9:02:58 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808429#83808429][img][/img][/url]
回复 [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&&fid=398&postid=83808438#83808438]6楼victoriabaobei的帖子[/url]
因为我对药和疫苗都很不看好,RNA病毒、ADE效应、大量二次感染和常阳患者的报告,这个冠状病毒哪那么容易被克服。不知道你们这些人的乐观态度都是哪里来的。。。
nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 9:07:05 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808466#83808466][img][/img][/url]
划重点: 没有control group。 看得懂英文的好好读读
The main concern, they say, stems from the fact that the Gilead trial expected to read out this week, which was conducted among patients with severe disease, lacks a control group — that is, patients who are randomly assigned to receive the best treatment available, but not remdesivir. As designed, the only randomization is the duration of treatment: either five days or 10 days of drug. Without a true control group of patients, many experts say, it will be difficult to determine whether remdesivir is effective.
“The overall study itself has little or no scientific value since all patients are receiving the drug,” said Steven Nissen, the chief academic officer at the Cleveland Clinic and lead investigator of many trials for heart drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
“The study, as designed, is essentially useless and cannot be used by the FDA for consideration of remdesivir for approval to treat coronavirus,” Nissen said.
Peter Bach, director of the Center for Health Policy and Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, called the situation “frustrating.”
“For them to run the trial in severe but not include a control group, it’s just such a waste,” Bach said.
cannie 发表于 4/29/2020 9:34:27 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808675#83808675][img][/img][/url]
内行人一看就知道结论是人造的。生物统计的test 设计是很严格的。哪能这样乱来。
这波炒作,就是华尔街想割韭菜。不信的就进场接盘。
pig0019 发表于 4/29/2020 1:27:49 PM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83811307#83811307][img][/img][/url]