发帖回复
查看:3467|回复:21
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission

不应有恨:伤痛疗愈的讨论

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
21-06-17 12:07操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣

我对宗教了解的不够多,不敢说有没有前世。但是我看过荣格的一些书,他晚年和一个非常有名天才物理学家走得很近,他们对因果的理解可能更深刻。


我们平常对因果的认知有一种本能的理解,因会导致果,所以从时间维度上来讲,因必须发生在果之前。但是物理研究到了一定维度,时间的概念开始超出我们的常识:比如,从相对论我们已经知道并且实验证实了时间本身不是绝对的,时间的流逝速度是可变的。那么,时间能不能倒流呢?如果时间倒流,对因果关系有什么样的影响呢?


后来他们提出了共时性(synchronicity)的概念,我的粗浅理解是共时性是比较弱的因果关系。


[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity[/url]

头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
21-06-17 12:11操作
查看全部AA分享

我嫌打字累,直接copy/paste了哈。另外提一句,Pauli是我最佩服的物理学家之一,他在现代物理学能顶爱因斯坦75%的分量。


Jung's view was that, just as causal connections can provide a meaningful understanding of the psyche and reality, so too may acausal connections.[4][15] Events connected by meaning need not have an explanation in terms of causality, which does not generally contradict universal causation but in specific cases can lead to prematurely giving up causal explanation.[16] The three identifying aspects of synchronistic events are (a) meaningful coincidence, (b) acausal connection, and (c) numinosity—the last of which has drawn the most criticism upon the entire concept.[3] Jung similarly proposed three categories of synchronistic phenomena, as when there is either (1) a meaningful correspondence between a mental state and a simultaneous physical event, (2) a meaningful correspondence between a mental state and a physical event outside the individual's perception, or (3) a meaningful correspondence between a mental state and some future event.[17]

Jung used the concept in arguing for the existence of the paranormal,[18] as did writer Arthur Koestler in his 1972 work The Roots of Coincidence.[19] The concept was similarly taken up by the New Age movement.[17] However, as it is scientifically neither testable nor falsifiable, synchronicity does not fall into the realm of empirical study.[17] The main objection from a scientific standpoint is that synchronistic events are experimentally indistinguishable from ordinary coincidences. While a given observer may subjectively view a coincidence as meaningful, this does not necessitate assigning any objective meaning to the coincidence.[17] Jung however, believed that meaning could be as rigorous and objective as logical thought by looking past personal feelings and instead to psychological elements that are held in common,[20] yet he did not conduct objective studies in this regard based on observable mental states and scientific data.[17] Mainstream science explains synchronicities and mere coincidences alike as underestimated chance events or spurious correlations which can be described by laws of statistics (e.g. by the law of truly large numbers) and confirmation biases.[21][22][23] However, for lack of more sophisticated explanations coincidence can also be useful as kind of link to folk psychology and philosophy.[23]

Moreover, it is considered that multiple meaningful coincidences contribute to the early formation of schizophrenic delusions (See also: Apophenia).[24] Distinguishing which of these synchronicities can be morbid, according to Jung, is a matter of interpretation[25]–pathology, if any, lies in the reaction rather than the occurrence of synchronistic experiences.[26] The International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis states that "it is important that the individual grasp [the] compensatory meaning" of a synchronistic event, in order for it to "enhance consciousness rather than merely build up superstitiousness".[27]

头像
0操作3 #
头像
3 #
0
21-06-17 21:01操作
查看全部AA分享

佛教里面也说时间是人为构建的。具体如何理解,好像还没有人能做到。刚刚在理解广义相对论的时候,我说或许因果和时空不可区分。是不是我们对因果的含义需要进一步的突破。


最近几周我在不断化解自身伤痛的时候,感觉到时间渐渐变慢了。相应的就是我的思维速度,内心感知速度变快了。以前我做不到multiple tasking,现在好像可以了,而且对每一个task好像可以同时持续的关注,而不是在每个task上快速分配小段时间。


对于如何理解时间是人为构造的,我还没什么clue。或许修行同时爱自己和爱他人会有帮助。


耶稣可以在同一时间在不同的地点出现。那他一定是理解了时间空间的本质的。


三波sangpo 发表于 2021-06-17 13:52

我中学的时候很喜欢物理,上大学是学工程的,出于爱好看了一些物理方面的书,肯定理解不如你深刻。物理学家和哲学家一样想要发现宇宙万物的终极规律,用数学模型来进行优美的表达。如果不需要操心柴米油盐,各种内卷,完全就像诗人一样浪漫。


荣格和泡利还猜测我们看到的物质和人的性格都是某种波的表达,而且不仅人和动物存在心理,存在个性,各种万物都存在这种波的表达。我觉得很奇妙,人的性格据说也是遗传的,这个是怎么通过基因传递的呢?也许真的存在灵魂?这样说来前生后世完全可能啊。

发帖回复
查看:3467|回复:21
  • 1
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回