你先生是那7个国家的公民么？

回复 [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2128023&postid=73996679#73996679]22楼我不咋渴的帖子[/url]

嗯， 建议再去读一遍EO。 有效签证和绿卡不一样。。

legal illegal真的有区别吗？
EO刚出来的时候不是铁定咬牙说绿卡也在里面，后来才说不ban，这说明在trump眼里根本就没有legal 不legal之分。你去听听朱利安尼怎么说的，trump要ban穆斯林，让他搞个legal的文本，这才找出那七个国家，拉o8下水。问题是o8的政策要是有用，你ban个啥，o8的政策要是没用，你干嘛要ban这7个国家而不去ban沙特。
有点脑子。这才开始。america first你自己照照镜子，问问自己是america吗。



shoppingisfun 发表于 1/31/2017 2:34:42 PM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2128023&postid=73998013#73998013][/url]

Trump 要Ban 穆斯林，首先就是个fause accusation. 你读了EO 的原文了么？上面一句穆斯林都没有，那七个国家的名字根本不在EO 的原文里。 EO 里引用的本来就是法律条文， 说得是“countries in concern"。 是OB 自己把这7个穆斯林国家列为terror threat 的。 另外嚷嚷为啥不加沙特的，人家沙特保护费交的好，给克林顿基金会交了多钱来着？

回复 [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2128023&postid=73998812#73998812]67楼shoppingisfun的帖子[/url] 我搜了啊，我帮你贴原文。不要在一段话里挑出来一句当圣旨来回嚼 GIULIANI: "I'll tell you the whole history of it. So, when he first announced it, he said: 'Muslim ban.' He called me up, he said: 'Put a commission together, show me the right way to do it legally.' I put a commission together with Judge Mukasey, with Congressman McCaul, Pete King, a whole group of other very expert lawyers on this; and what we did was we focused on, instead of religion, danger. The areas of the world that create danger for us, which is a factual basis; it's not a religious basis. Perfectly legal, perfectly sensible--and that's what the ban is based on. It's not based on religion, it's based on places where there are [sic] substantial evidence where people are sending terrorists into our country." 另外，你读EO 原文了么？要不要我也帮你贴出来？