这帖子真是太丢脸了。WSN过来洗脑有意思么？美国信息公开，这么多数据，一搜不就有了？白男平均尺寸13.5厘米，国男，看好了，平均8.375厘米。
[url=https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/20750013]https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/20750013[/url]
引自知乎：
生理上正常范围内大点小点无所谓，但心理上的小，是没药医的
小红薯 发表于 8/2/2019 9:52:20 PM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2440250&postid=81038663#81038663][img][/img][/url]
你继续往下看就会看到有网友把你引用的这篇垃圾全文打脸。拼命非要引用垃圾文献来加强偏见我也是服了
你不觉得自己已经自卑到一定程度了吗？
以下是打脸原文
[url=https://www.zhihu.com/question/21442920/answer/196608068]https://www.zhihu.com/question/21442920/answer/196608068[/url]
现在在中国网络上盛行传留的图片全是从一个白人至上者的一个伪科学种族理论论文出来的，Richard Lynn - Wikipedia。想读西方科学家界普遍对他的伪科学的严重批评，请点连接，是英语，一时不能全翻译。
However, his review work on global racial differences in cognitive ability has been cited for misrepresenting the research of other scientists, and has been criticised for unsystematic methodology and distortion.
In a critical review of The Bell Curve, psychologist Leon Kamin faulted Lynn for "disregarding scientific objectivity", "misrepresenting data", and for "racism".[93] Kamin argues that the studies of cognitive ability of Africans in Lynn's meta-analysis cited by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray show strong cultural bias. Kamin also reproached Lynn for concocting IQ values from test scores that have no correlation to IQ.[94] Kamin also notes that Lynn excluded a study that found no difference in White and Black performance, and ignored the results of a study which showed Black scores were higher than White scores.[95]
Journalist Charles Lane criticised Lynn's methodology in his article in The New York Review of Books, "The Tainted Sources of The Bell Curve" (1994).[96]Pioneer Fund president Harry Weyher, Jr. published a response accusing the reviewer of errors and misrepresentation; Lane also replied to this with a rebuttal.[97] Race, Evolution, and Behavior
According to Richard R. Valencia, the response to the first edition of Rushton's book was "overwhelmingly negative", with only a small number of supporters, many being, like Rushton, Pioneer Fund grantees, such as Arthur Jensen, Michael Levin and Richard Lynn.[7]
Valencia identified the main areas of criticism as focusing on Rushton's use of "race" as a biological concept, a failure to appreciate the extent of variation within populations compared with that between populations, a false separation of genetics and environment, poor statistical methodology, a failure to consider alternative hypotheses, and the use of unreliable and inappropriate data to draw conclusions about the relationship between brain size and intelligence. According to Valencia, "experts in life history conclude that Rushton's (1995) work is pseudoscientific and racist."
Richard Lynn 已经是出了名的喜欢用伪或片面的数据来推广他的私人的白人至上主义观点。他的“论文”普遍被科学界的权威机构批评。
他的基本目的是：白人IQ比黑人IQ高很多，东亚人IQ比白人稍微高一点，但是阴茎特别小，身体素质都不如白人，所以说明白人最好。
-------
广泛传播的图片在中国全都用一模一样的数字，说明信息源头都一样。图可能不同，但是数字完全一样，这说明只有一个数据源头，没被cross verified by multiple sources.
[/url]
