发帖
查看:1362|回复:3
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

[讨论]大家来讨论一下,

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
06-01-18 18:18操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣
[讨论]大家来讨论一下,

我们日思梦想的思严厉被paula说成这样:


Brand: Decleor


Decleor
So what can I tell you about a line whose average product costs about $50 and whose typical recommended skin-care routine costs from $250 to $400 (and that doesn't include sunscreen), for what adds up to nothing more than oil and waxes and a ton of fragrance? If you are someone who feels that spending excessive amounts of money on skin care is worth it, there are far better-formulated lines to consider than this one, which lacks so many excellent contemporary ingredients. Decleor is replete with an implausibly redundant multitude of moisturizers that, for the most part, lack any unique or state-of-the-art water-binding agents, or have more than trace amounts of antioxidants or anti-irritants. ”


受打击了



头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
06-01-18 18:22操作
查看全部AA分享

我还买了这个牌子的cream 15.


Brand: Yon-Ka Paris


Yon-Ka Paris
"Yon is a river in China known as a place of eternal beauty and renewal, chosen to symbolize the purity of the products; Ka is Egyptian for vital energy, representing the life force that all botanicals possess." Wow! But that is incredibly overblown for some fairly standard products that contain some incredibly unnatural ingredients that range from propylene glycol to polyethylene glycol-33, Vaseline, mineral oil, methylparaben, polyquaternium-11, diazolidinyl urea, triethanolamine, and on and on. Don't misunderstand me, I don't think any of those ingredients are terrible or awful for skin, but Yon-Ka Paris maintains that they are bad for skin. It is just inexplicably ironic that Yon-Ka Paris makes it abundantly clear from its piles of marketing information and stacks of training manuals that many of the ingredients in the company's own products are offensive to them! Didn't anyone else notice this?

Advertisement
发帖回复
查看:1362|回复:3
  • 1
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回