发帖
查看:38447|回复:252
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission

《名利场》Vanity Fair 刊发了对当前最热点话题迄今为止最为翔实的长篇调查报告 更新:追加时间线及作者访谈视频

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
21-06-05 15:54操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣

很多内容大家都知道了

但也有些新料,值得花时间一读…



The Lab-Leak Theory: Inside the Fight to Uncover COVID-19’s Origins

Throughout 2020, the notion that the novel coronavirus leaked from a lab was off-limits. Those who dared to push for transparency say toxic politics and hidden agendas kept us in the dark.


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-lab-leak-theory-inside-the-fight-to-uncover-covid-19s-origins


2019年9月,病毒数据库下线的时间,和武汉同期应对新冠病毒感染者的演练,纯属巧合?


They paid one visit to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where they met with Shi Zhengli, as recounted in an annex to the mission report. One obvious demand would have been access to the WIV’s database of some 22,000 virus samples and sequences, which had been taken offline. At an event convened by a London organization on March 10, Daszak was asked whether the group had made such a request. He said there was no need: Shi Zhengli had stated that the WIV took down the database due to hacking attempts during the pandemic. “Absolutely reasonable,” Daszak said. “And we did not ask to see the data…. As you know, a lot of this work has been conducted with EcoHealth Alliance…. We do basically know what’s in those databases. There is no evidence of viruses closer to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13 in those databases, simple as that.”

In fact, the database had been taken offline on September 12, 2019, three months before the official start of the pandemic, a detail uncovered by Gilles Demaneuf and two of his DRASTIC colleagues.


Shang_Ri_La 发表于 2021-06-05 13:52

so the potential leak might happen before 09/2019???

头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
21-06-05 17:34操作
查看全部AA分享

just read, 好多干货...

头像
2操作3 #
头像
3 #
2
21-06-05 21:44操作
查看全部AA分享

不明所以。我们这里讨论来讨论去,甚至还有莫名其妙的美国放毒论,这不是言论自由是什么。如此单纯的一个溯源议题,在中国只有一个声音,是外国,是外国,是外国。。


noshock 发表于 2021-06-05 21:34

这种深度的报导中国根本不会有。文章也没有draw conclusion, 就是陈述了各种调查结果和artifacts.楼上洗地的id们估计文章都没读完

头像
6操作4 #
头像
4 #
6
21-06-05 23:40操作
查看全部AA分享

文中有一点很有意思,柳叶刀去年曾经发过一份科学家们的倡议书谴责实验室泄漏说,背后发起人正是Peter Daszak. 他给unc Baric 写信建议他别签名,说这样倡议书会显得更公正。Baric也是回信同意了。这个Peter Daszak 就是把nih funding 转包给石正丽的人,同时也是武汉WHO 的lead调查员。Dadzak是从疫情一开始就在背后到处都运作,坚绝否认和WIV可能有关,这种人的调查能有什么公信力

头像
0操作5 #
头像
5 #
0
21-06-05 23:44操作
查看全部AA分享
回复 46楼何小满的帖子

原文好像说美国提出三个人,都不接受,后来选了另一个美国代表Paul。


noshock 发表于 2021-06-05 23:39

Paul is Peter Daszak?

头像
1操作6 #
头像
6 #
1
21-06-06 00:07操作
查看全部AA分享

彼得打杂客这两天上了cctv,强烈抨击实验室泄漏的阴谋论!


bigjohn123456 发表于 2021-06-06 00:01

文中讲NIH去年把他funding cut了。

发帖回复
查看:38447|回复:252
  • 1
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回