禁止同性恋夫妇认养小孩全美爆发-第1页

bigeyes

0操作1 ^#

以下是引用yitian在2006-2-23 0:48:00的发言：

人家垃圾箱里捡没人要的内裤妨害谁的利益了？怎么就造成损害了？偷窥都不定罪的，造成什么损害了？为什么我就失去理智。定义弱势群体，你怎么定义？难道内衣癖就是不是弱势群体？你定义弱势不弱势是按照自己的喜好？

i think you are out of your mind. take it easy 8.

bigeyes

0操作2 ^#

以下是引用jackyjngwn在2006-2-23 1:43:00的发言：

还是不要让他们领养小孩的好吧。因为同性恋这个东西，有很多人不是天生而是后天受的影响。这样等于让孩子在没有选择的情况下，进入一个同性恋的圈子。这样即使是正常人都变成同性恋了。

kind of don't like the way you say it. you mean gays are not normal?

bigeyes

0操作3 ^#

以下是引用bbcat在2006-2-23 0:26:00的发言：

well,我支持同性恋婚姻，也支持他们收养小孩

I am with you!

The only thing I am concerned is the name of the union. It might be a good idea to give it a different name other than 'marriage'. From what I know 'marriage' was defined in the bible as the union of a man and a woman. And I know this is the reason why a lot of people are against it.

As for adoption, they definitely have the ability to raise and educate children properly. Actually I think overall they will do an even better job than average parents (not to mention those problem parents). On the other hand, a lot of lesbians have children using donated sperms, why can't gay/lesbian couple adopt?

禁止同性恋夫妇认养小孩 全美爆发

禁止同性恋夫妇认养小孩全美爆发