发帖回复
查看:6027|回复:202
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission

禁止同性恋夫妇认养小孩 全美爆发

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
06-02-23 01:39操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣
以下是引用yitian在2006-2-23 0:48:00的发言:




人家垃圾箱里捡没人要的内裤妨害谁的利益了? 怎么就造成损害了? 偷窥都不定罪的,造成什么损害了? 为什么我就失去理智。 定义弱势群体,你怎么定义? 难道内衣癖就是不是弱势群体? 你定义弱势不弱势是按照自己的喜好?


i think you are out of your mind. take it easy 8.

头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
06-02-23 01:53操作
查看全部AA分享
以下是引用jackyjngwn在2006-2-23 1:43:00的发言:

还是不要让他们领养小孩的好吧。因为同性恋这个东西,有很多人不是天生而是后天受的影响。这样等于让孩子在没有选择的情况下,进入一个同性恋的圈子。这样即使是正常人都变成同性恋了。





kind of don't like the way you say it. you mean gays are not normal?

头像
0操作3 #
头像
3 #
0
06-02-23 02:03操作
查看全部AA分享
以下是引用bbcat在2006-2-23 0:26:00的发言:


well,我支持同性恋婚姻,也支持他们收养小孩



I am with you!


The only thing I am concerned is the name of the union. It might be a good idea to give it a different name other than 'marriage'. From what I know 'marriage' was defined in the bible as the union of a man and a woman. And I know this is the reason why a lot of people are against it.


As for adoption, they definitely have the ability to raise and educate children properly. Actually I think overall they will do an even better job than average parents (not to mention those problem parents). On the other hand, a lot of lesbians have children using donated sperms, why can't gay/lesbian couple adopt?

发帖回复
查看:6027|回复:202
  • 1
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回