发帖回复
查看:3406|回复:12
  • 1
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

[分享]To PHD or not to PHD

头像
0操作1 #
头像
1 #
0
06-03-02 16:25操作
查看全部AA分享不感兴趣
[分享]To PHD or not to PHD

<http://www.sciencejobs.com/insider/article.action?article.id=insider161&focusId=uk>


The ariticle is for colleague grats. Though I totally agree that


"On the upside however, a Ph.D. gives you far more versatility than
you might expect. Someone who's demonstrated Ph.D.-level perseverance
and dedication makes an attractive job candidate -- even in unrelated
fields."

头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
06-03-03 08:24操作
查看全部AA分享
以下是引用mingm在2006-3-3 0:04:00的发言:
胡扯![em08][em08][em08][em08]

Which part?


Cannot help asking...I'm always intereted in strong opinion. [em08]


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-3 8:45:02编辑过]

Advertisement
头像
0操作3 #
头像
3 #
0
06-03-03 22:08操作
查看全部AA分享
以下是引用nanoparticle在2006-3-3 17:09:00的发言:
要看是学什么的。有些专业的phD是浪费生命。

Like what?

头像
0操作4 #
头像
4 #
0
06-03-04 13:42操作
查看全部AA分享
以下是引用trayanh在2006-3-4 13:36:00的发言:
IEEE有一期杂志上贴了一篇文章,中间有关于这个的

Where, where?

头像
0操作5 #
头像
5 #
0
06-03-06 09:26操作
查看全部AA分享

同学,先搞根杠子来,大家也好抬阿。比如说,认为我在这胡扯,罗列些错误。我就肯定跳起来乐。

Advertisement
发帖回复
查看:3406|回复:12
  • 1
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回