无罪推定 is of course better. But it is neither necessary nor practical to
ask everyone on the world to follow the rule. And I really don't think
it could be used to against those who think SW was guilty.

Just think about the situation that your neighbor was interrogated by
the police because he was a potential sex offender. But this guy was
finally released because there was not enough evidence to press
charges. In that situation, even the guy was assumed innocent, I think
it would be perfectly normal for many people to be scare of him and
protect their children from him....

Anyway I think it's no big deal for people to suspect SW was guilty, as
long as their suspicion are not interfering the law enforcement.

对凶手要讲什么人性和动机阿。 只要有凶手， 就一定有个匪夷所思的动机。（就像小贝说的，清华刘海洋泼熊，你说他有什么动机阿。）


除非动机是朱令犯了什么滔天大罪。 可是就算那样， 咱还得给朱令找个说得过去的动机呀。


反正我觉得反孙的各位不必说话了，一说很容易被人打上没有逻辑的标签，还是老实捐钱，或者去天涯造造舆论搞不好案件能重审。
挺孙的各位也不必说话了，用跟对方一样的方法去推断这些蛛丝马迹有什么意思。一句话，从现有资料看不出孙是下毒者不就完了么。
费心给孙论证人也看不出到不是。