以下是引用illusion06在6/6/2011 8:01:00 PM的发言：

I kept asking them not to attack without knowing what's going on.
So with a MM proof that she saw the price as $3700 for single in Saks, they still insist I am selling on a higher price.
What else I could do?

以下是引用illusion06在6/6/2011 8:04:00 PM的发言：

it is  3700 ah.

以下是引用illusion06在6/6/2011 8:11:00 PM的发言：

mm, you can see the receipt in the original post. They post it over and over multiple times.
I don't have the picture on my work computer right now, so i can't post anything at this moment.

以下是引用换版监督员在6/6/2011 8:14:00 PM的发言：

是否马甲不重要，只要质疑的点有根据make sense. 请不要纠结这点。

 

原帖有多位id同样质疑135(9?)开头的序列号卖3700这个价格的低概率性。

所以，你有必要解释并证明你没有低买高卖，收据显示的包和实际转手的包是否为同一个。

也有id提出了证明你的方法：

1、对比tag和收据，但你的tag没了。

2、电话请sa电脑调出你要转手包的序列号对应的卖出价格。