发帖
查看:38449|回复:252
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission

《名利场》Vanity Fair 刊发了对当前最热点话题迄今为止最为翔实的长篇调查报告 更新:追加时间线及作者访谈视频

头像
5操作1 #
头像
1 #
5
21-06-05 13:52操作
只看楼主AA分享不感兴趣
《名利场》Vanity Fair 刊发了对当前最热点话题迄今为止最为翔实的长篇调查报告 更新:追加时间线及作者访谈视频

很多内容大家都知道了

但也有些新料,值得花时间一读…



The Lab-Leak Theory: Inside the Fight to Uncover COVID-19’s Origins

Throughout 2020, the notion that the novel coronavirus leaked from a lab was off-limits. Those who dared to push for transparency say toxic politics and hidden agendas kept us in the dark.


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-lab-leak-theory-inside-the-fight-to-uncover-covid-19s-origins


2019年9月,病毒数据库下线的时间,和武汉同期应对新冠病毒感染者的演练,纯属巧合?


They paid one visit to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where they met with Shi Zhengli, as recounted in an annex to the mission report. One obvious demand would have been access to the WIV’s database of some 22,000 virus samples and sequences, which had been taken offline. At an event convened by a London organization on March 10, Daszak was asked whether the group had made such a request. He said there was no need: Shi Zhengli had stated that the WIV took down the database due to hacking attempts during the pandemic. “Absolutely reasonable,” Daszak said. “And we did not ask to see the data…. As you know, a lot of this work has been conducted with EcoHealth Alliance…. We do basically know what’s in those databases. There is no evidence of viruses closer to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13 in those databases, simple as that.”


In fact, the database had been taken offline on September 12, 2019, three months before the official start of the pandemic, a detail uncovered by Gilles Demaneuf and two of his DRASTIC colleagues.


June 6, 2021 更新

我把最近一个月以来围绕新冠病毒溯源的主要事件按时间线总结了一下,欢迎大家评论补充


May 5: Former New York Times science reporter Nicholas Wade, writing in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, reviews the evidence and makes a strong case for the lab-leak theory. He focuses in particular on the furin cleavage site, which increases viral infectivity for human cells. His analysis yields this quote from David Baltimore, a virologist and former president of the California Institute of Technology: “When I first saw the furin cleavage site in the viral sequence, with its arginine codons, I said to my wife it was the smoking gun for the origin of the virus. These features make a powerful challenge to the idea of a natural origin for SARS2.”

https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/


May 7: James Freeman, Assistant editor, editorial page, The Wall Street Journal became the first reporter of a major news outlet challenging the intertwined relationship among China, Fauci and Origins of COVID

https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-fauci-and-the-origins-of-covid-11620419989


May 11: During a Senate hearing on the pandemic response, Paul alleged that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) had been sending funding to the Wuhan lab, which then "juiced up" a virus that was originally found in bats to create a super virus that can infect human cells. Paul pressed Fauci on the theory that the novel coronavirus was created in the Wuhan lab, and then somehow escaped, either because of an accident or because it was deliberately released.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/552857-rand-paul-clashes-with-fauci-over-coronavirus-origins


May 14: Eighteen prominent scientists publish a letter in the journal Science, saying a new investigation is needed because “theories of accidental release from a lab and zoonotic spillover both remain viable.” One signer is Ralph Baric, a virologist who worked closely with Shi.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/694.1


May 17: Another former New York Times science reporter, Donald G. McNeil Jr., posts on Medium: “How I Learned to Stop Worrying And Love the Lab-Leak Theory.” He quotes W. Ian Lipkin of Columbia University — who had signed the March 2020 letter in Nature Medicine — as saying his mind had changed in light of new information.

https://donaldgmcneiljr1954.medium.com/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-lab-leak-theory-f4f88446b04d


May 23: WSJ published an exclusive news piece which reports three researchers from China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology became sick enough in November 2019 that they sought hospital care, according to a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report that could add weight to growing calls for a fuller probe of whether the Covid-19 virus may have escaped from the laboratory.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/intelligence-on-sick-staff-at-wuhan-lab-fuels-debate-on-covid-19-origin-11621796228


May 24: Anthony Fauci, apparently “changed” his mind, admitted earlier this month that he is no longer convinced that the Covid-19 pandemic originated naturally.

Same day, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, the 23rd commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), said the growing number of reports provide an increasing amount of circumstantial evidence supporting the theory that the virus could have escaped from a lab.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/24/politics/fauci-donald-trump-coronavirus/index.html

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/24/gottlieb-says-theres-growing-circumstantial-evidence-that-covid-may-have-originated-in-a-lab.html


May 26: President Biden ordered the Intelligence Community to redouble their efforts to collect and analyze information that could bring us closer to a definitive conclusion, and to report back in 90 days.

Same day, The Editorial Board of WSJ endorsed the credibility of The Virus Lab Theory

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/05/26/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-the-investigation-into-the-origins-of-covid-19/

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-virus-lab-theorys-new-credibility-11622066808


June 2: Uncovered Emails Show Fauci’s deep involvement in Gain of Function research

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20793561/leopold-nih-foia-anthony-fauci-emails.pdf


June 3: Vanity Fair published a nearly 12,000-word article by award-winning journalist Katherine Eban; it''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s much worth reading on the bottom line question of whether COVID-19 indeed stemmed from a lab leak.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-lab-leak-theory-inside-the-fight-to-uncover-covid-19s-origins


June 6:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-19-wuhan-origins-60-minutes-2021-06-06/#app

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-science-suggests-a-wuhan-lab-leak-11622995184


系统提示:若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/znisx0wQMGA?showinfo=0



系统提示:若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NNm2uMBB-W8?showinfo=0



头像
0操作2 #
头像
2 #
0
21-06-05 15:23操作
只看TAAA分享

原文很长,但绝对值得一读。

头像
0操作3 #
头像
3 #
0
21-06-05 15:54操作
只看TAAA分享

很多内容大家都知道了

但也有些新料,值得花时间一读…



The Lab-Leak Theory: Inside the Fight to Uncover COVID-19’s Origins

Throughout 2020, the notion that the novel coronavirus leaked from a lab was off-limits. Those who dared to push for transparency say toxic politics and hidden agendas kept us in the dark.


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-lab-leak-theory-inside-the-fight-to-uncover-covid-19s-origins


2019年9月,病毒数据库下线的时间,和武汉同期应对新冠病毒感染者的演练,纯属巧合?


They paid one visit to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where they met with Shi Zhengli, as recounted in an annex to the mission report. One obvious demand would have been access to the WIV’s database of some 22,000 virus samples and sequences, which had been taken offline. At an event convened by a London organization on March 10, Daszak was asked whether the group had made such a request. He said there was no need: Shi Zhengli had stated that the WIV took down the database due to hacking attempts during the pandemic. “Absolutely reasonable,” Daszak said. “And we did not ask to see the data…. As you know, a lot of this work has been conducted with EcoHealth Alliance…. We do basically know what’s in those databases. There is no evidence of viruses closer to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13 in those databases, simple as that.”

In fact, the database had been taken offline on September 12, 2019, three months before the official start of the pandemic, a detail uncovered by Gilles Demaneuf and two of his DRASTIC colleagues.


Shang_Ri_La 发表于 2021-06-05 13:52

so the potential leak might happen before 09/2019???

头像
33操作4 #
头像
4 #
33
21-06-05 16:12操作
只看TAAA分享

回复 3楼brookeyang的帖子


很有可能

意大利的最早的病例可能是2019年11月底到12月从武汉传过去的,在人群中隐形传播了大概2-3个月才爆发

武汉也一样,12月已经爆发(要不然不会引起李文亮这种眼科医生的注意,也不会开始传到世界各国),往前推2-3个月就是9月左右。

武汉肯定知道有个超级传播者去过华南海鲜市场,所以早期拼命往华南海鲜市场上贴,但是同时肯定也知道他不是最早的一批病人。

其实lab-leak更高的可能性来自于武汉疾控中心的P2和P3实验室,他们也做蝙蝠病毒研究,CCTV在2019年底疫情没爆发的时候还有专题片。P2和P3的管理要松懈多了,又正好在疫情揭发之前搬家到华南海鲜市场附近。武汉地方很有动机去掩盖事故。他们做蝙蝠病毒研究的人自从疫情爆发之后就隐形了,剩下远在武昌的石正丽挡子弹。

头像
5操作5 #
头像
5 #
5
21-06-05 16:32操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 4楼ArizonaGreenTea的帖子

美国《名利场》虽是时尚杂志,但另设团队专门从事时事调查报道,屡爆独家新闻。《

名利场》杂志6月3日发表长达1.2万字的调查报道,探讨美国主流舆论如何和为何一直

淡化新型冠状病毒溯源的“实验室外泄论”。报道提到24名业内专家去年的《柳叶刀》

联署信,令舆论认为外泄论只是阴谋论,连特朗普政府尝试溯源调查也受内部庞大阻力

,难以将调查方向转向“功能增益”研究,有前高官质疑业界跟这项研究有太多利益轇

轕而妨碍中立调查。其中以世界卫生组织访华调查团专家成员达斯扎克最受争议,他任

职的机构长年收取华府拨款从事功能增益研究,合作对象正包括武汉病毒研究所。


据明报今天报道,探讨美舆论淡化“实验室外泄论”成因,《名利场》揭美专家科研利

益碍溯源。


《名利场》虽是时尚杂志,但另设团队专门从事时事调查报道,屡爆独家新闻。该杂志

周四(3日)报道,经连月调查,访问逾40人,又审视几百页政府文件,包括内部备忘

、会议纪录和电邮等,发现科学界有连串利益冲突嫌疑,令美国政府的病毒溯源调查工

作受阻,部分涉及华府巨额资助的争议性“功能增益”(gain of function)病毒研究

。这类研究主要是透过强化病毒以了解其特性。


美国资助研究涉武汉研究所


《名利场》报道指国务院一个溯源调查小组发现,3名在武汉病毒研究所从事冠状病毒

功能增益工作的研究员,前年秋天、即疫情已知爆发前染病,但在去年12月国务院4个

不同部门参与的会议上,有高官建议美国官方拒谈,以免外界之后聚焦到华府在功能增

益研究的角色,令不少与会者感到惊讶。报道还引述4名前国务院官员指,调查小组成

员被反复敦促不要打开“潘朵拉的盒子”,调查小组的直属上司坦言情况“感觉像掩饰

”。


时任疾病控制及预防中心(CDC)主任雷德菲尔德(Robert Redfield)受访时更表示,

他去年3月表示支持外泄论后,收到来自一些著名科学家的死亡恐吓,“我预计会来自

政客,没预计来自科学界”。


白宫国家安全委员会有另一由时任副国安顾问博明统筹的病毒溯源团队。博明向《名利

场》称,许多业界顶尖专家都跟功能增益研究密切相关,收取或负责审批相关拨款,有

利益冲突之嫌,变相严重妨碍中立调查。


世卫访华专家卷利益冲突争议


该报道称,其中嫌疑最大的是世卫赴华专家组成员达斯扎克(Peter Daszak),这名英

籍动物学家屡次公开反驳外泄论。报道指出,达斯扎克出任主席的“生态健康联盟”多

年来收到华府资助,再将其分发予个别实验室和科研机构,在病毒学界形成巨大影响力

。生态健康联盟其一合作对象是武汉病毒研究所,据《新闻周刊》报道,达斯扎克跟石

正丽合著十数份论文,又经手至少60万美元的华府拨款予对方。生态健康联盟与武汉病

毒研究所的关系,一度促使特朗普政府直接下令叫停拨款,却引发81名诺贝尔奖得主发

公开信谴责,迫使当局改为向拨款设立条件。


达斯扎克是去年2月《刺血针》也叫《柳叶刀》24名专家联署信的幕后推手,该信在科

学界如同一锤定音,令实验室外泄论一直被视为阴谋论。声明宣称参与者不涉利益冲突

,但《名利场》揭发有至少6名联署人士在生态健康联盟工作或受其资助,所引述的外

泄电邮亦显示,达斯扎克曾致函两名曾跟石正丽合作研究的科学家,称他们不应加入联

署,以免反令外界关注他们的科研合作联系。


明报说,中方一向否认实验室外泄论等病毒人造论述,并谴责西方藉疫情搞污名化和政

治操弄。

头像
25操作6 #
头像
6 #
25
21-06-05 16:34操作
只看TAAA分享

越来越多的证据都指向同一个方向。。。

头像
1操作7 #
头像
7 #
1
21-06-05 16:35操作
只看TAAA分享

回复 3楼brookeyang的帖子


很有可能

意大利的最早的病例可能是2019年11月底到12月从武汉传过去的,在人群中隐形传播了大概2-3个月才爆发

武汉也一样,11月已经爆发(要不然不会引起李文亮这种眼科医生的注意),往前推2-3个月就是9月左右。

武汉肯定知道有个超级传播者去过华南海鲜市场,所以早期拼命往华南海鲜市场上贴,但是同时肯定也知道他不是最早的一批病人。

其实lab-leak更高的可能性来自于武汉疾控中心的P2和P3实验室,他们也做蝙蝠病毒研究,CCTV在2019年底疫情没爆发的时候还有专题片。P2和P3的管理要松懈多了,又正好在疫情揭发之前搬家到华南海鲜市场附近。武汉地方很有动机去掩盖事故。他们做蝙蝠病毒研究的人自从疫情爆发之后就隐形了,剩下远在武昌的石正丽挡子弹。


ArizonaGreenTea 发表于 2021-06-05 16:12

可是好几年前国内网站就有人爆料p4管理混乱,有实验人员把动物往外卖的现象,那时候covid好连个毛都没有呢

头像
113操作8 #
头像
8 #
113
21-06-05 16:40操作
只看TAAA分享

其实到今天也没有实验室泄漏的铁证

问题是只要国际一提溯源,中国政府就好像被戳了G点一样撒泼打滚

先是赵立坚提出一个根本很可笑的美国实验室泄漏说

全世界没一个国家当真,连盟国俄罗斯巴基斯坦都没支持

昨天记者又问了溯源问题

看着满头白发像个体面人的外交部发言人汪文斌又一次当众躺地上撒泼,要求彻查美国实验室

不能不让人怀疑啊


头像
1操作9 #
头像
9 #
1
21-06-05 16:42操作
只看TAAA分享

其实到今天也没有实验室泄漏的铁证

问题是只要国际一提溯源,中国政府就好像被戳了G点一样撒泼打滚

先是赵立坚提出一个根本很可笑的美国实验室泄漏说

全世界没一个国家当真,连盟国俄罗斯巴基斯坦都没支持

昨天记者又问了溯源问题

看着满头白发像个体面人的外交部发言人汪文斌又一次当众躺地上撒泼,要求彻查美国实验室

不能不让人怀疑啊



ArizonaGreenTea 发表于 2021-06-05 16:40

必有妖

头像
0操作10 #
头像
10 #
0
21-06-05 16:44操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 1楼Shang_Ri_La的帖子

这报道内容丰富,我前面的贴也提到。我有个safari 译文的pdf 版本,但是格式混乱,不合适贴在本版上。

头像
0操作11 #
头像
11 #
0
21-06-05 17:34操作
只看TAAA分享

just read, 好多干货...

头像
7操作12 #
头像
12 #
7
21-06-05 18:45操作
只看楼主AA分享

这是言论自由和新闻自由对公民社会和事实真相无比重要的佐证!


A months long Vanity Fair investigation, interviews with more than 40 people, and a review of hundreds of pages of U.S. government documents, including internal memos, meeting minutes, and email correspondence, found that conflicts of interest, stemming in part from large government grants supporting controversial virology research, hampered the U.S. investigation into COVID-19’s origin at every step. 

头像
0操作13 #
头像
13 #
0
21-06-05 18:46操作
只看楼主AA分享
回复 5楼Derechenz的帖子

谢谢分享中文摘要

头像
6操作14 #
头像
14 #
6
21-06-05 18:51操作
只看TAAA分享

影星时装杂志也蹭热点

谁审稿呢?

头像
16操作15 #
头像
15 #
16
21-06-05 19:01操作
只看TAAA分享

影星时装杂志也蹭热点

谁审稿呢?


fitzroy 发表于 2021-06-05 18:51

人人都可以审查,包括你在内。即使去年,也有几个重要媒体都报道lab leak 可能性。

头像
3操作16 #
头像
16 #
3
21-06-05 19:05操作
只看TAAA分享

lab leak可能性很大

头像
15操作17 #
头像
17 #
15
21-06-05 19:10操作
只看TAAA分享

影星时装杂志也蹭热点

谁审稿呢?


fitzroy 发表于 2021-06-05 18:51

一看你要不是墙内的,要不就是只看中文微信群。

vanity fair相当正统,报导的广度深度的质量挺高。当然文章都挺长的,英语不好的就是能看看图片当成时尚杂志了。


头像
5操作18 #
头像
18 #
5
21-06-05 19:13操作
只看TAAA分享

一看你要不是墙内的,要不就是只看中文微信群。

vanity fair相当正统,报导的广度深度的质量挺高。当然文章都挺长的,英语不好的就是能看看图片当成时尚杂志了。



shoppingisfun 发表于 2021-06-05 19:10

英语说shoppingisfun的人跑出来一本正经的说别人英文不好,这是啥冷笑话?

头像
4操作19 #
头像
19 #
4
21-06-05 19:18操作
只看TAAA分享

阴谋论说了这么久了,都是剩饭。aids都炒了几十年了,也没见到个定论。

头像
2操作20 #
头像
20 #
2
21-06-05 19:43操作
只看TAAA分享

其实到今天也没有实验室泄漏的铁证

问题是只要国际一提溯源,中国政府就好像被戳了G点一样撒泼打滚

先是赵立坚提出一个根本很可笑的美国实验室泄漏说

全世界没一个国家当真,连盟国俄罗斯巴基斯坦都没支持

昨天记者又问了溯源问题

看着满头白发像个体面人的外交部发言人汪文斌又一次当众躺地上撒泼,要求彻查美国实验室

不能不让人怀疑啊



ArizonaGreenTea 发表于 2021-06-05 16:40

我也找这么看,本来事出有因,查无实据,推给大自然就end of story.

一个编故事造谣美国投毒说,一个陈薇军管五毒所,是让人生疑。

发帖回复
查看:38449|回复:252
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回