很多华人为什么不希望Obma当选？-第22页

Caffeine

0操作421 ^#

以下是引用tobeornottobe在2008-9-11 14:19:00的发言：

统计上讲，的确是民主党总统经济搞得好。但是对每个总统来说，近代经济搞得最差的是民主党的卡特，搞得最好的是民主党克林顿，生活在小克世代当然不错，可是赶上卡特，就倒霉了。不知道会不会有人真的看这张表格投票。

Bill Clinton pumped up the economy by creating two bubbles: the tech bubble and the housing bubble. that alone will prove that the statistics is fundamentally flawed.

Caffeine

0操作422 ^#

以下是引用angeliali在2008-9-11 14:19:00的发言：

that is the factor that weighs most.

i Know

fromautumn

0操作423 ^#

以下是引用ilovebluedkk在2008-9-10 11:35:00的发言：

这是什么逻辑，美国总统基本上都是名校毕业，难道这些总统都是合格总统？华人不支持他不是因为他是黑人，而是因为他要均贫富吃大锅饭的政策。

难道我们马上就要进入传说中的共产主义社会？？？ [em63]

sassygirl

0操作424 ^#

以下是引用ratzinger在2008-9-11 10:53:00的发言：

这个妹妹，休息去吧，共和党粉丝是很认真的。说一点共和党的不好，你就是O的粉丝，逻辑有问题，性格，思维有问题。共和党可以攻击人的人品有问题。然后讲到共和党人的性格，就说个人的性格有什么关系，主要是政策。。。领教了。

偶不是谁的粉丝。克林顿的时候也吃饱了，布什的时候抗伊拉克也没饿肚子，反正谁上台偶一样混口饭吃。偶是看好老头上台的。万一O上台，美国又有多少移民英才要流失，岂不太惨。

上次有位铁杆坚持说老头的前妻狠狠踹了他。。。老头要是知道他有这么铁杆的支持者，估计要感激涕零的。

是啊，basically everyone who likes obama, even just relatively, is considered stupid or downright retarded by 共和党粉丝 here.

对所有胆敢和共和党粉丝较劲的ID致敬，需要无限的耐心，承受力和好脾气。

boobii

0操作425 ^#

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-11 14:13:00的发言：

Obama should have been eliminated in the resume review process. He shouldn't have got an interview 图片点击可在新窗口打开查看

So far as I know, HLS offers some economic courses too. [em63]

clamp1999

0操作426 ^#

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-11 14:17:00的发言：

if that's the condition, I won't run then

there is something called "fake tan". You know, just like everyone else. Pretend to be someone else to win. [em63]

boobii

0操作427 ^#

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-11 14:11:00的发言：

me, me! I'm from the best school and I'm a minority. Caffeine for President!

YEAH! YEAH! Support! [em68]

Minority in a double meaning

boobii

0操作428 ^#

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-11 14:22:00的发言：

i Know

LOL..... you are so cute! [em85]

The factor might be also part of the reason why "很多华人为什么不希望Obma当选"

hardcandy

0操作429 ^#

以下是引用liumao在2008-9-10 15:41:00的发言：

我相信大部分的人，都是喜欢少干活，多拿钱，不干活，也拿钱的。

否则全世界都是ENTREPRENUER。

是neur吧。。。

hardcandy

0操作430 ^#

以下是引用fishbaby1983在2008-9-10 15:46:00的发言：

是很向往。
偶碰到的欧洲gg说“我们那里人太懒，我想好好干活于是就来美国了” 图片点击可在新窗口打开查看

其实我觉得老墨干活是我见过的人里面最拼的了。。。

hardcandy

0操作431 ^#

为什么到现在还有人想让美国经济变差来给中国喘气的机会呢？这是什么样的一种想法啊。。。

至少我生活在美国，我希望美国强大，经济蹿升；同样我是个中国人，也希望中国有天可以和美国一样强大。。。

shanshan00

0操作432 ^#

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-11 14:21:00的发言：

Bill Clinton pumped up the economy by creating two bubbles: the tech bubble and the housing bubble. that alone will prove that the statistics is fundamentally flawed.

agree, how come no one ever mentions these facts? they always mention the great growth in stock market, just look at how many no-longer-existent high-tech companies that contributed significantly to that stock market growth!

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-11 15:10:41编辑过]

hardcandy

0操作433 ^#

以下是引用fishbaby1983在2008-9-10 19:51:00的发言：

要是偶就装傻说“I see. You want change. You must be Obama fan..” 图片点击可在新窗口打开查看

呵呵

我要是遇到这种情况估计也装不懂了

觉得黑人啥都能干出来，怕怕

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-11 15:30:08编辑过]

hardcandy

0操作434 ^#

以下是引用daka在2008-9-10 19:53:00的发言：

非洲来的黑人要好些。我以前认识一个非洲到这里留学的黑人，她也看不惯美国黑人。我觉得美国黑人就是让奴隶制给害了，先是身体上被奴役；然后觉得白人永远欠他们的，思想上没法over这一点，就永远觉得不求上进，依赖社会是理直气壮的。

我也觉得，历史造成的影响难以磨灭，他们就觉得白人欠他们的，从来不从自己身上找原因

yuanyuanlu

0操作435 ^#

ò???ê?òyó?Caffeine?ú2008-9-11 13:58:00μ?·￠??￡o
the fundamental flaw of those economics analysis is that it ignored economic cycles as well as the power of congress and the supreme court.

It is time series data, so accounts for economic cycles. Economic cycle presents for both parties, right?

And your statement of lagged effect is also counted (Clinton created tech & housing bubbles...)

tobeornottobe

0操作436 ^#

以下是引用Caffeine在2008-9-11 14:21:00的发言：

Bill Clinton pumped up the economy by creating two bubbles: the tech bubble and the housing bubble. that alone will prove that the statistics is fundamentally flawed.

当年的泡沫也好，现在的通货膨胀也好，总统要负一部分责的，但是最应该负责的是格老和老本。

Caffeine

0操作437 ^#

以下是引用yuanyuanlu在2008-9-11 16:21:00的发言：

It is time series data, so accounts for economic cycles. Economic cycle presents for both parties, right?

And your statement of lagged effect is also counted (Clinton created tech & housing bubbles...)

From what I read, I don't think it is the case......

yuanyuanlu

0操作438 ^#

ò???ê?òyó?Caffeine?ú2008-9-11 17:35:00μ?·￠??￡o

From what I read, I don't think it is the case......

The fact is, Democratic presidents have consistently higher economic growth and consistently lower unemployment than Republican presidents. If you add in a time lag, you get the same result. If you eliminate the best and worst presidents, you get the same result. If you take a look at other economic indicators, you get the same result. There's just no way around it: Democratic administrations are better for the economy than Republican administrations.

seven3

0操作439 ^#

以下是引用yuanyuanlu在2008-9-11 20:26:00的发言：

The fact is, Democratic presidents have consistently higher economic growth and consistently lower unemployment than Republican presidents. If you add in a time lag, you get the same result. If you eliminate the best and worst presidents, you get the same result. If you take a look at other economic indicators, you get the same result. There's just no way around it: Democratic administrations are better for the economy than Republican administrations.

I don't think your fact is quite true. And regardless that fact, why there are many more republican presidents than democrats presidents after WWII? People aren't stupid.

greenflower

0操作440 ^#

people aint no stupid, just regardless that fact, [em50]

很多华人为什么不希望Obma当选？

提示信息

密码找回

没有帐号？立即注册