发帖
查看:72694|回复:261
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

人民的希望 Remdesivir 4/29新闻

tlt.gif
头像
60操作1 #
头像
1 #
60
20-04-29 08:47操作
只看楼主AA分享不感兴趣
人民的希望 Remdesivir 4/29新闻
声明:我不是托。没有和这个股票的任河关系。我的401k共同基金可能有。

Edit

1. Fauci statements below. and CNBC video here: [url=https://rd2.huaren.us/huaren.php?hrtopic_id=2541213&hrurl=https%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fnbcnews%2fstatus%2f1255541788154224641%3fs%3d21]https://twitter.com/nbcnews/status/1255541788154224641?s=21[/url]
- NYT: FDA to announce Emergency Use of remdesivir as early as Wednesday
2. 北京这次怎么这么恶心啊。刚出了好消息,然后就把在中国的“failed" study 结果贴在了lancet上。你们这些人,做事要有点良心。一次次刷底线,要脸么?
3. 这个帖子一下子看出来需要屏蔽的id是什么。



两个Gilead自己的发布:

1. 第一个。这个是美国政府的双盲。

Gilead Sciences Statement on Positive Data Emerging From National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ Study of Investigational Antiviral
Remdesivir for COVID-19

Business Wire

FOSTER CITY, Calif. -- April 29, 2020

Gilead Sciences. Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) is aware of positive data emerging from
the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) study of
the investigational antiviral remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.
We
understand that the trial has met its primary endpoint and that NIAID will
provide detailed information at an upcoming briefing.

Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet
been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19.
Gilead will share additional remdesivir data from the company’s open-label
Phase 3 SIMPLE trial in patients with severe COVID-19 disease shortly. This
study will provide information on whether a shorter, 5-day duration of therapy
may have similar efficacy and safety as the 10-day treatment course evaluated
in the NIAID trial and other ongoing trials. Gilead expects data at the end of
May from the second SIMPLE study evaluating the 5- and 10-day dosing durations
of remdesivir in patients with moderate COVID-19 disease.

Gilead will continue to discuss with regulatory authorities the growing data
set regarding remdesivir as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

2.randomized trial
Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral
Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19

-- Study Demonstrates Similar Efficacy with 5- and 10-Day Dosing Durations of
Remdesivir --

Business Wire

FOSTER CITY, Calif. -- April 29, 2020

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) today announced topline results from the
open-label, Phase 3 SIMPLE trial evaluating 5-day and 10-day dosing durations
of the investigational antiviral remdesivir in hospitalized patients with
severe manifestations of COVID-19 disease. The study demonstrated that
patients receiving a 10-day treatment course of remdesivir achieved similar
improvement in clinical status compared with those taking a 5-day treatment
course (Odds Ratio: 0.75 [95% CI 0.51 – 1.12] on Day 14). No new safety
signals were identified with remdesivir across either treatment group. Gilead
plans to submit the full data for publication in a peer-reviewed journal in
the coming weeks.

“Unlike traditional drug development, we are attempting to evaluate an
investigational agent alongside an evolving global pandemic. Multiple
concurrent studies are helping inform whether remdesivir is a safe and
effective treatment for COVID-19 and how to best utilize the drug,” said
Merdad Parsey, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer, Gilead Sciences. “These study
results complement data from the placebo-controlled study of remdesivir
conducted by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases and
help to determine the optimal duration of treatment with remdesivir. The study
demonstrates the potential for some patients to be treated with a 5-day
regimen, which could significantly expand the number of patients who could be
treated with our current supply of remdesivir. This is particularly important
in the setting of a pandemic, to help hospitals and healthcare workers treat
more patients in urgent need of care.”

Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet
been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19. This
study sought to determine whether a shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir would
achieve similar efficacy results as the 10-day treatment regimen used in
multiple ongoing studies of remdesivir. Secondary objectives included rates of
adverse events and additional measures of clinical response in both treatment
groups. Patients were required to have evidence of pneumonia and reduced
oxygen levels that did not require mechanical ventilation at the time of study
entry. Clinical improvement was defined as an improvement of two or more
points from baseline on a predefined seven-point scale, ranging from hospital
discharge to increasing levels of oxygen support to death. Patients achieved
clinical recovery if they no longer required oxygen support and medical care
or were discharged from the hospital.

In this study, the time to clinical improvement for 50 percent of patients was
10 days in the 5-day treatment group and 11 days in the 10-day treatment
group. More than half of patients in both treatment groups were discharged
from the hospital by Day 14 (5-day: 60.0%, n=120/200 vs.10-day: 52.3%
n=103/197; p=0.14). At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the
5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day
treatment group achieved clinical recovery.

Clinical outcomes varied by geography. Outside of Italy, the overall mortality
rate at Day 14 was 7 percent (n=23/320) across both treatment groups, with 64
percent (n=205/320) of patients experiencing clinical improvement at Day 14
and 61 percent (n=196/320) of patients discharged from the hospital.

Impact of Earlier Treatment

In an exploratory analysis, patients in the study who received remdesivir
within 10 days of symptom onset had improved outcomes compared with those
treated after more than 10 days of symptoms. Pooling data across treatment
arms, by Day 14, 62 percent of patients treated early were able to be
discharged from the hospital, compared with 49 percent of patients who were
treated late.

“These data are encouraging as they indicate that patients who received a
shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir experienced similar clinical improvement
as patients who received a 10-day treatment course,” said Aruna Subramanian,
MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Chief, Immunocompromised Host Infectious
Diseases, Stanford University School of Medicine, and one of the lead
investigators of the study. “While additional data are still needed, these
results help to bring a clearer understanding of how treatment with remdesivir
may be optimized, if proven safe and effective.”

Remdesivir was generally well-tolerated in both the 5-day and 10-day treatment
groups. The most common adverse events occurring in more than 10 percent of
patients in either group were nausea (5-day: 10.0%, n=20/200 vs. 10-day: 8.6%,
n=17/197) and acute respiratory failure (5-day: 6.0%, n=12/200 vs. 10-day:
10.7%, n= 21/197). Grade 3 or higher liver enzyme (ALT) elevations occurred in
7.3 percent (n=28/385) of patients, with 3.0 percent (n=12/397) of patients
discontinuing remdesivir treatment due to elevated liver tests.

Key efficacy and safety results from the study are included in the table
below.

5-Day RDV 10-Day RDV Baseline adjusted
n=200 n=197 p-value^1
Clinical Efficacy Outcomes at Day 14
≥ 2-point improvement in ordinal scale 129 (65) 107 (54) 0.16
Clinical recovery 129 (65) 106 (54) 0.17
Discharge 120 (60) 103 (52) 0.44
Death 16 (8) 21 (11) 0.70
Safety
Any adverse event (AE) 141 (71) 145 (74) 0.86
Grade ≥3 study drug-related AE 8 (4) 10 (5) 0.65
Study drug-related serious adverse 3 (2) 4 (2) 0.73
event (SAE)
AE leading to discontinuation 9 (5) 20 (10) 0.07

^1Adjusted for baseline clinical status

About the SIMPLE Trials

Gilead initiated two randomized, open-label, multi-center Phase 3 clinical
trials for remdesivir, the SIMPLE studies, in countries with high prevalence
of COVID-19 infection.

The first SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and
10-day dosing regimens of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe
manifestations of COVID-19. The initial phase of the study randomized 397
patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive remdesivir 200 mg on the first day,
followed by remdesivir 100 mg each day until day 5 or 10, administered
intravenously, in addition to standard of care. An expansion phase of the
study was recently added and will enroll an additional 5,600 patients,
including patients on mechanical ventilation. The study is being conducted at
180 trial sites around the world, including sites in the United States, China,
France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

A second SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and
10-day dosing durations of remdesivir administered intravenously in patients
with moderate manifestations of COVID-19, compared with standard of care. The
results from the first 600 patients of this study are expected at the end of
May.
头像
9操作2 #
头像
2 #
9
20-04-29 08:48操作
只看楼主AA分享
quick note from an analyst: "This is earlier than expected Most important study we are aware of. Has a placebo. This is the trial run by the govt – NOT the GILD trial we were expecting results out today or tomorrow. This was NOT just in severe patients. This is MODERATE and severe It hit the primary endpoint which means it hit the efficacy end point which for dummies means it works. "
Advertisement
头像
11操作3 #
头像
3 #
11
20-04-29 08:58操作
只看TAAA分享
声明:我不是托。没有和这个股票的任河关系。我的401k共同基金可能有。

两个Gilead自己的发布:

1. 第一个。这个是美国政府的双盲。

Gilead Sciences Statement on Positive Data Emerging From National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ Study of Investigational Antiviral
Remdesivir for COVID-19

Business Wire

FOSTER CITY, Calif. -- April 29, 2020

Gilead Sciences. Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) is aware of positive data emerging from
the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) study of
the investigational antiviral remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.
We
understand that the trial has met its primary endpoint and that NIAID will
provide detailed information at an upcoming briefing.

Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet
been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19.
Gilead will share additional remdesivir data from the company’s open-label
Phase 3 SIMPLE trial in patients with severe COVID-19 disease shortly. This
study will provide information on whether a shorter, 5-day duration of therapy
may have similar efficacy and safety as the 10-day treatment course evaluated
in the NIAID trial and other ongoing trials. Gilead expects data at the end of
May from the second SIMPLE study evaluating the 5- and 10-day dosing durations
of remdesivir in patients with moderate COVID-19 disease.

Gilead will continue to discuss with regulatory authorities the growing data
set regarding remdesivir as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

2.randomized trial
Gilead Announces Results From Phase 3 Trial of Investigational Antiviral
Remdesivir in Patients With Severe COVID-19

-- Study Demonstrates Similar Efficacy with 5- and 10-Day Dosing Durations of
Remdesivir --

Business Wire

FOSTER CITY, Calif. -- April 29, 2020

Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: GILD) today announced topline results from the
open-label, Phase 3 SIMPLE trial evaluating 5-day and 10-day dosing durations
of the investigational antiviral remdesivir in hospitalized patients with
severe manifestations of COVID-19 disease. The study demonstrated that
patients receiving a 10-day treatment course of remdesivir achieved similar
improvement in clinical status compared with those taking a 5-day treatment
course (Odds Ratio: 0.75 [95% CI 0.51 – 1.12] on Day 14). No new safety
signals were identified with remdesivir across either treatment group. Gilead
plans to submit the full data for publication in a peer-reviewed journal in
the coming weeks.

“Unlike traditional drug development, we are attempting to evaluate an
investigational agent alongside an evolving global pandemic. Multiple
concurrent studies are helping inform whether remdesivir is a safe and
effective treatment for COVID-19 and how to best utilize the drug,” said
Merdad Parsey, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer, Gilead Sciences. “These study
results complement data from the placebo-controlled study of remdesivir
conducted by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases and
help to determine the optimal duration of treatment with remdesivir. The study
demonstrates the potential for some patients to be treated with a 5-day
regimen, which could significantly expand the number of patients who could be
treated with our current supply of remdesivir. This is particularly important
in the setting of a pandemic, to help hospitals and healthcare workers treat
more patients in urgent need of care.”

Remdesivir is not yet licensed or approved anywhere globally and has not yet
been demonstrated to be safe or effective for the treatment of COVID-19. This
study sought to determine whether a shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir would
achieve similar efficacy results as the 10-day treatment regimen used in
multiple ongoing studies of remdesivir. Secondary objectives included rates of
adverse events and additional measures of clinical response in both treatment
groups. Patients were required to have evidence of pneumonia and reduced
oxygen levels that did not require mechanical ventilation at the time of study
entry. Clinical improvement was defined as an improvement of two or more
points from baseline on a predefined seven-point scale, ranging from hospital
discharge to increasing levels of oxygen support to death. Patients achieved
clinical recovery if they no longer required oxygen support and medical care
or were discharged from the hospital.

In this study, the time to clinical improvement for 50 percent of patients was
10 days in the 5-day treatment group and 11 days in the 10-day treatment
group. More than half of patients in both treatment groups were discharged
from the hospital by Day 14 (5-day: 60.0%, n=120/200 vs.10-day: 52.3%
n=103/197; p=0.14). At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the
5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day
treatment group achieved clinical recovery.

Clinical outcomes varied by geography. Outside of Italy, the overall mortality
rate at Day 14 was 7 percent (n=23/320) across both treatment groups, with 64
percent (n=205/320) of patients experiencing clinical improvement at Day 14
and 61 percent (n=196/320) of patients discharged from the hospital.

Impact of Earlier Treatment

In an exploratory analysis, patients in the study who received remdesivir
within 10 days of symptom onset had improved outcomes compared with those
treated after more than 10 days of symptoms. Pooling data across treatment
arms, by Day 14, 62 percent of patients treated early were able to be
discharged from the hospital, compared with 49 percent of patients who were
treated late.

“These data are encouraging as they indicate that patients who received a
shorter, 5-day course of remdesivir experienced similar clinical improvement
as patients who received a 10-day treatment course,” said Aruna Subramanian,
MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Chief, Immunocompromised Host Infectious
Diseases, Stanford University School of Medicine, and one of the lead
investigators of the study. “While additional data are still needed, these
results help to bring a clearer understanding of how treatment with remdesivir
may be optimized, if proven safe and effective.”

Remdesivir was generally well-tolerated in both the 5-day and 10-day treatment
groups. The most common adverse events occurring in more than 10 percent of
patients in either group were nausea (5-day: 10.0%, n=20/200 vs. 10-day: 8.6%,
n=17/197) and acute respiratory failure (5-day: 6.0%, n=12/200 vs. 10-day:
10.7%, n= 21/197). Grade 3 or higher liver enzyme (ALT) elevations occurred in
7.3 percent (n=28/385) of patients, with 3.0 percent (n=12/397) of patients
discontinuing remdesivir treatment due to elevated liver tests.

Key efficacy and safety results from the study are included in the table
below.

5-Day RDV 10-Day RDV Baseline adjusted
n=200 n=197 p-value^1
Clinical Efficacy Outcomes at Day 14
≥ 2-point improvement in ordinal scale 129 (65) 107 (54) 0.16
Clinical recovery 129 (65) 106 (54) 0.17
Discharge 120 (60) 103 (52) 0.44
Death 16 (8) 21 (11) 0.70
Safety
Any adverse event (AE) 141 (71) 145 (74) 0.86
Grade ≥3 study drug-related AE 8 (4) 10 (5) 0.65
Study drug-related serious adverse 3 (2) 4 (2) 0.73
event (SAE)
AE leading to discontinuation 9 (5) 20 (10) 0.07

^1Adjusted for baseline clinical status

About the SIMPLE Trials

Gilead initiated two randomized, open-label, multi-center Phase 3 clinical
trials for remdesivir, the SIMPLE studies, in countries with high prevalence
of COVID-19 infection.

The first SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and
10-day dosing regimens of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe
manifestations of COVID-19. The initial phase of the study randomized 397
patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive remdesivir 200 mg on the first day,
followed by remdesivir 100 mg each day until day 5 or 10, administered
intravenously, in addition to standard of care. An expansion phase of the
study was recently added and will enroll an additional 5,600 patients,
including patients on mechanical ventilation. The study is being conducted at
180 trial sites around the world, including sites in the United States, China,
France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Singapore,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

A second SIMPLE trial is evaluating the safety and efficacy of 5-day and
10-day dosing durations of remdesivir administered intravenously in patients
with moderate manifestations of COVID-19, compared with standard of care. The
results from the first 600 patients of this study are expected at the end of
May.




Caffeine 发表于 2020-04-29 08:47

两个巨大的red flag,第一是没有对照组,第二是这一句话:At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the

5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day

treatment group achieved clinical recovery.


用药10天的治愈率更低?!是否说明药的作用是反的?


个人仍然持强烈怀疑态度,等NIH实验的结果,从这个实验结果看不出药有用。

头像
7操作4 #
头像
4 #
7
20-04-29 08:59操作
只看TAAA分享
股市看涨, 好消息
头像
25操作5 #
头像
5 #
25
20-04-29 09:02操作
只看TAAA分享
本来就是应对伊波拉的药,指望它完全对症新冠从来就不现实。短期内没别的药,先拉上顶着而已,好歹比用于应对艾滋病的克利芝感觉离新冠近些
Advertisement
头像
85操作6 #
头像
6 #
85
20-04-29 09:04操作
只看TAAA分享
也可以说10天对比5天用药之后没有出现明显的副作用不是吗 你这个ID反对药,反对疫苗,只要对病毒有利的消息下面都能看到你在下面踩几脚,什么心态?
两个巨大的red flag,第一是没有对照组,第二是这一句话:At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the 5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day treatment group achieved clinical recovery. 用药10天的治愈率更低?!是否说明药的作用是反的? 个人仍然持强烈怀疑态度,等NIH实验的结果,从这个实验结果看不出药有用。 nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 8:58:00 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=83808399&postid=83808399#83808399][img][/img][/url]

头像
0操作7 #
头像
7 #
0
20-04-29 09:04操作
只看TAAA分享
GILD盘前大涨
头像
1操作8 #
头像
8 #
1
20-04-29 09:05操作
只看TAAA分享
好消息。谢谢分享
头像
14操作9 #
头像
9 #
14
20-04-29 09:06操作
只看楼主AA分享
也可以说10天对比5天用药之后没有出现明显的副作用不是吗
你这个ID反对药,反对疫苗,只要对病毒有利的消息下面都能看到你在下面踩几脚,什么心态?



victoriabaobei 发表于 4/29/2020 9:04:17 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808438#83808438][img][/img][/url]


这种带节奏的屏蔽就好了:)
头像
10操作10 #
头像
10 #
10
20-04-29 09:06操作
只看TAAA分享
两个巨大的red flag,第一是没有对照组,第二是这一句话:At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-daytreatment group achieved clinical recovery.用药10天的治愈率更低?!是否说明药的作用是反的?个人仍然持强烈怀疑态度,等NIH实验的结果,从这个实验结果看不出药有用。
nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 8:58:13 AM

奇了怪了,是药三分毒没听过?能吃5天治好干嘛非要吃10天,完全没毛病。抗生素不也是有规定用药周期么
Advertisement
头像
3操作11 #
头像
11 #
3
20-04-29 09:07操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 6楼victoriabaobei的帖子

因为我对药和疫苗都很不看好,RNA病毒、ADE效应、大量二次感染和常阳患者的报告,这个冠状病毒哪那么容易被克服。不知道你们这些人的乐观态度都是哪里来的。。。

头像
134操作12 #
头像
12 #
134
20-04-29 09:09操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&&fid=398&postid=83808438#83808438]6楼victoriabaobei的帖子[/url]
因为我对药和疫苗都很不看好,RNA病毒、ADE效应、大量二次感染和常阳患者的报告,这个冠状病毒哪那么容易被克服。不知道你们这些人的乐观态度都是哪里来的。。。

nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 9:07:05 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808466#83808466][img][/img][/url]

别装了,你是对美国所有东西不看好
头像
9操作13 #
头像
13 #
9
20-04-29 09:11操作
只看TAAA分享

两个巨大的red flag,第一是没有对照组,第二是这一句话:At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the
5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day
treatment group achieved clinical recovery.

用药10天的治愈率更低?!是否说明药的作用是反的?

个人仍然持强烈怀疑态度,等NIH实验的结果,从这个实验结果看不出药有用。

nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 8:58:13 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808399#83808399][img][/img][/url]


没有对照组,研究个屁啊?!
这是有机构在炒作这只股票而已。
头像
65操作14 #
头像
14 #
65
20-04-29 09:12操作
只看TAAA分享

别装了,你是对美国所有东西不看好
stainlessbelief 发表于 4/29/2020 9:09:23 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808489#83808489][img][/img][/url]

一针见血
头像
1操作15 #
头像
15 #
1
20-04-29 09:12操作
只看TAAA分享
不错,前几天泄露不利消息的中国人跟WHO估计都赚了一笔。。。
Advertisement
头像
66操作16 #
头像
16 #
66
20-04-29 09:13操作
只看TAAA分享
看看WHO武汉卫生组织上周的表演,是不是觉得无比丑恶?!
头像
6操作17 #
头像
17 #
6
20-04-29 09:14操作
只看TAAA分享
这只股票明显是机构炒作。大家小心。(楼主是华尔街的,一个月前就说疫情拐点,让大家进场救股市。)
头像
4操作18 #
头像
18 #
4
20-04-29 09:15操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 12楼stainlessbelief的帖子

我对厉害国在试验的三个疫苗更不看好,谢谢。不知道为什么总有人给我扣五毛的帽子。


厉害国的实验疫苗两个是灭活病毒,对免疫系统的刺激不够,说不定引发ADE死的更快;另一个腺病毒载体用的病毒在人群中太常见,大多数人对那个载体病毒已经有抗体,疫苗一打进去就被人体自己的免疫系统灭了。

头像
60操作19 #
头像
19 #
60
20-04-29 09:18操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&&fid=398&postid=83808489#83808489]12楼stainlessbelief的帖子[/url]
我对厉害国在试验的三个疫苗更不看好,谢谢。不知道为什么总有人给我扣五毛的帽子。

厉害国的实验疫苗两个是灭活病毒,对免疫系统的刺激不够,说不定引发ADE死的更快;另一个腺病毒载体用的病毒在人群中太常见,大多数人对那个载体病毒已经有抗体,疫苗一打进去就被人体自己的免疫系统灭了。

nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 9:15:08 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808538#83808538][img][/img][/url]


因为你就是五毛。
头像
4操作20 #
头像
20 #
4
20-04-29 09:19操作
只看TAAA分享
quick note from an analyst:
"This is earlier than expected
Most important study we are aware of. Has a placebo.
This is the trial run by the govt – NOT the GILD trial we were expecting results out today or tomorrow.
This was NOT just in severe patients. This is MODERATE and severe
It hit the primary endpoint which means it hit the efficacy end point which for dummies means it works. "
Caffeine 发表于 4/29/2020 8:48:37 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808345#83808345][img][/img][/url]


建议加上今早Dr. Scott Gottlieb 在CNBC的采访,他说话一直非常谨慎。

As we've been saying for some time now, accumulating data on Remdesivir suggests it's active against covid and there's now enough data to support consideration of access under an emergency use authorization by FDA. The data from NIAID study should push this firmly over the line.

Gilead’s remdesivir, along with therapeutic antibodies and improved testing, is part of “a robust toolbox,” Dr. Scott Gottlieb says. “All of this is going to put us in a much different posture for the fall.” [url=https://t.co/xl18L8D9XO?amp=1]https://cnb.cx/2SgbRfu[/url]

https://twitter.com/ScottGottliebMD/status/1255484418745151495?s=20

发帖回复
查看:72694|回复:261
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回