发帖
查看:72696|回复:261
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

人民的希望 Remdesivir 4/29新闻

头像
4操作21 #
头像
21 #
4
20-04-29 09:21操作
只看TAAA分享
华尔街要大家进场接盘了。
头像
12操作22 #
头像
22 #
12
20-04-29 09:21操作
只看TAAA分享


没有对照组,研究个屁啊?!
这是有机构在炒作这只股票而已。


pig0019 发表于 4/29/2020 9:11:14 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808506#83808506][img][/img][/url]

当然有对照。你没看试验设计吗?对照是“standard of care"
Advertisement
头像
2操作23 #
头像
23 #
2
20-04-29 09:21操作
只看TAAA分享
割韭菜开始
头像
13操作24 #
头像
24 #
13
20-04-29 09:22操作
只看TAAA分享
看看WHO武汉卫生组织上周的表演,是不是觉得无比丑恶?!
Absurdist 发表于 4/29/2020 9:13:31 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808524#83808524][img][/img][/url]


还有那个无底线维护WHO的盖子。今早看到他的一个采访,当记者问到疫情对美国经济和社会的灾难性影响,他都抑制不住得意的笑出声,起鸡皮疙瘩。
头像
4操作25 #
头像
25 #
4
20-04-29 09:30操作
只看TAAA分享
啪啪啪打你脸
两个巨大的red flag,第一是没有对照组,第二是这一句话:At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-daytreatment group achieved clinical recovery.用药10天的治愈率更低?!是否说明药的作用是反的?个人仍然持强烈怀疑态度,等NIH实验的结果,从这个实验结果看不出药有用。
nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 8:58:13 AM

Advertisement
头像
8操作26 #
头像
26 #
8
20-04-29 09:34操作
只看TAAA分享
划重点: 没有control group。 看得懂英文的好好读读 The main concern, they say, stems from the fact that the Gilead trial expected to read out this week, which was conducted among patients with severe disease, lacks a control group — that is, patients who are randomly assigned to receive the best treatment available, but not remdesivir. As designed, the only randomization is the duration of treatment: either five days or 10 days of drug. Without a true control group of patients, many experts say, it will be difficult to determine whether remdesivir is effective. “The overall study itself has little or no scientific value since all patients are receiving the drug,” said Steven Nissen, the chief academic officer at the Cleveland Clinic and lead investigator of many trials for heart drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. “The study, as designed, is essentially useless and cannot be used by the FDA for consideration of remdesivir for approval to treat coronavirus,” Nissen said. Peter Bach, director of the Center for Health Policy and Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, called the situation “frustrating.” “For them to run the trial in severe but not include a control group, it’s just such a waste,” Bach said.
头像
4操作27 #
头像
27 #
4
20-04-29 09:35操作
只看TAAA分享
本来就是应对伊波拉的药,指望它完全对症新冠从来就不现实。短期内没别的药,先拉上顶着而已,好歹比用于应对艾滋病的克利芝感觉离新冠近些


galezhang 发表于 4/29/2020 9:02:58 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808429#83808429][img][/img][/url]

人类研究药本来就不是指哪儿打哪儿

伟哥一开始好像是准备治心脏病啥的
头像
5操作28 #
头像
28 #
5
20-04-29 09:36操作
只看TAAA分享
划重点: 没有control group。 看得懂英文的好好读读

The main concern, they say, stems from the fact that the Gilead trial expected to read out this week, which was conducted among patients with severe disease, lacks a control group — that is, patients who are randomly assigned to receive the best treatment available, but not remdesivir. As designed, the only randomization is the duration of treatment: either five days or 10 days of drug. Without a true control group of patients, many experts say, it will be difficult to determine whether remdesivir is effective.

“The overall study itself has little or no scientific value since all patients are receiving the drug,” said Steven Nissen, the chief academic officer at the Cleveland Clinic and lead investigator of many trials for heart drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

“The study, as designed, is essentially useless and cannot be used by the FDA for consideration of remdesivir for approval to treat coronavirus,” Nissen said.

Peter Bach, director of the Center for Health Policy and Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, called the situation “frustrating.”

“For them to run the trial in severe but not include a control group, it’s just such a waste,” Bach said.
cannie 发表于 4/29/2020 9:34:27 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808675#83808675][img][/img][/url]



没有 Control group ,研究个屁啊。华尔街有人要拉垫背的。
头像
5操作29 #
头像
29 #
5
20-04-29 09:38操作
只看TAAA分享

两个巨大的red flag,第一是没有对照组,第二是这一句话:At Day 14, 64.5 percent (n=129/200) of patients in the
5-day treatment group and 53.8 percent (n=106/197) of patients in the 10-day
treatment group achieved clinical recovery.

用药10天的治愈率更低?!是否说明药的作用是反的?

个人仍然持强烈怀疑态度,等NIH实验的结果,从这个实验结果看不出药有用。

nyc15 发表于 4/29/2020 8:58:13 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808399#83808399][img][/img][/url]

抬头看ID系列
头像
1操作30 #
头像
30 #
1
20-04-29 09:38操作
只看TAAA分享
华尔街一直炒作这支股。现在没人接盘了。亏大了。
Advertisement
头像
7操作31 #
头像
31 #
7
20-04-29 09:40操作
只看TAAA分享

别装了,你是对美国所有东西不看好
stainlessbelief 发表于 4/29/2020 9:09:23 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808489#83808489][img][/img][/url]

一针见黑血
头像
4操作32 #
头像
32 #
4
20-04-29 09:51操作
只看TAAA分享

别装了,你是对美国所有东西不看好
stainlessbelief 发表于 4/29/2020 9:09:23 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808489#83808489][img][/img][/url]

无毛一只,早屏蔽了
头像
0操作33 #
头像
33 #
0
20-04-29 09:56操作
只看TAAA分享

无毛一只,早屏蔽了

lishu2 发表于 4/29/2020 9:51:46 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808837#83808837][img][/img][/url]

咋屏蔽呢?能教一下吗?谢谢!
头像
3操作34 #
头像
34 #
3
20-04-29 10:02操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808675#83808675]26楼cannie的帖子[/url] 公布了两个trial的结果。Gilead自己的没有placebo。NIH的那个有placebo。
头像
12操作35 #
头像
35 #
12
20-04-29 10:03操作
只看TAAA分享
quick note from an analyst:
"This is earlier than expected
Most important study we are aware of. Has a placebo.
This is the trial run by the govt – NOT the GILD trial we were expecting results out today or tomorrow.
This was NOT just in severe patients. This is MODERATE and severe
It hit the primary endpoint which means it hit the efficacy end point which for dummies means it works. "
Caffeine 发表于 4/29/2020 8:48:37 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808345#83808345][img][/img][/url]


看着几个五毛发疯的样子,偷偷乐一下。 谢谢咖啡因,一大早带来这么好的消息。 顺便鄙视一下ccp对gilead各种使坏,太没人性。
Advertisement
头像
5操作36 #
头像
36 #
5
20-04-29 10:05操作
只看TAAA分享
回复 [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808675#83808675]26楼cannie的帖子[/url]

公布了两个trial的结果。Gilead自己的没有placebo。NIH的那个有placebo。
nitride 发表于 4/29/2020 10:02:01 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808901#83808901][img][/img][/url]


这些五毛,要么看不懂英文,要么装瞎。非蠢即坏。 看他们跳,一边觉得他们真是可悲,一边又觉得好好笑。
头像
1操作37 #
头像
37 #
1
20-04-29 10:12操作
只看TAAA分享
"The overall mortality rates in the five-day and 10-day groups were 8.0% (n=16/200) and 10.7% (n=21/197), respectively." 这个?
头像
1操作38 #
头像
38 #
1
20-04-29 10:16操作
只看TAAA分享
"The overall mortality rates in the five-day and 10-day groups were 8.0% (n=16/200) and 10.7% (n=21/197), respectively." 这个?
atomicmass 发表于 2020-04-29 10:12

线性外推的话就是说不用药的死亡率是5.4%

头像
4操作39 #
头像
39 #
4
20-04-29 10:17操作
只看TAAA分享
"The overall mortality rates in the five-day and 10-day groups were 8.0% (n=16/200) and 10.7% (n=21/197), respectively." 这个?
atomicmass 发表于 4/29/2020 10:12:51 AM [url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213&postid=83808988#83808988][img][/img][/url]


这是重症的。这个出了数据的trial是只收重症的。 用20%重症率来算, 那么[url=https://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2541213]人民的希望[/url]推广后死亡率是20%*8%=1.6%。 这还是假设轻症不用药的情况。 轻症目前看药效其实更好。那么如果轻症用药可以降低重症率,死亡率还会更低。弄不好降到1%以下都有可能。 嘻嘻。
头像
4操作40 #
头像
40 #
4
20-04-29 10:18操作
只看TAAA分享
那天看何大一的采访,他也最看好人民的希望。感觉应该是类似tamiflu的作用。
发帖回复
查看:72696|回复:261
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回