发帖回复
查看:69128|回复:306
When you buy via links in posts, huaren.us may earn a commission
Advertisement

转: 新wsn出世,STANFORD禽兽教授崔屹

头像
0操作121 #
头像
121 #
0
07-01-19 15:24操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用shoon_yee在2007-1-19 14:36:00的发言:

agree.

She put herself in a so perfect position. Too innocent to blame. If she is a so thoughtful person, she would not talk about pregnancy with Cui even after she knew he had a wife.

Personally, I still think the only victims are the kids and the wife.

[em01][em10]

support! Huaren is really lady's home. I am so happy to see opinions here are totally different from mit![em06]
头像
0操作122 #
头像
122 #
0
07-01-19 15:26操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用shoon_yee在2007-1-19 14:44:00的发言:

I was told that I don't believe only because I hate Di San Zhe. [em01]

and what's wrong with that? a 17 or 19 year old should be sane enough to decide who to sleep with, right?
Advertisement
头像
0操作123 #
头像
123 #
0
07-01-19 15:26操作
只看TAAA分享

是地,这个圣母很厉害.

千错万错,CY管不住自己的...都是它害的...

头像
0操作124 #
头像
124 #
0
07-01-19 15:26操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用cloudymind在2007-1-19 15:14:00的发言:

由此推论正确的做法应该是

把无辜的小孩打掉?

典型的大奶对私生子理论。

打孩子就一定是大奶的理论阿
我女儿要是这样肯定让她打掉
就算是cy能够负担赡养小孩子的费用 又怎么样
她才20/21啊 自己都顾不过来 孩子怎么会幸福, 而且这会是她今后多大的负担。。。

[em12]
头像
0操作125 #
头像
125 #
0
07-01-19 15:28操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用ConnieBear在2007-1-19 15:26:00的发言:

and what's wrong with that? a 17 or 19 year old should be sane enough to decide who to sleep with, right?

The only difference is that a 17 year old is considered a minor under california law, and Cui should be put away in jail for what he did to her!   
Advertisement
头像
0操作126 #
头像
126 #
0
07-01-19 15:28操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用xhxck在2007-1-19 14:38:00的发言:
我也这么觉得。小姑娘很可怕的,在装乖卖可怜,博取舆论的同情。我倒不是支持cy,就感慨现在的小姑娘都不得了。

mitbbs上的wsn男们都义愤添殷的, 个个恨不得纠出cy来。连cy的lp这个完完全全的受害者都贝说成大尾巴狼了。

完全同意. 实在受不了mitbbs那边的论调了,跑到这里来透透气.

头像
0操作127 #
头像
127 #
0
07-01-19 15:29操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用cloudymind在2007-1-19 15:23:00的发言:

不过小姐姐(就是崔屹的妻子)给我打了电话,她很
关心我和孩子跟我说了非常多,她说崔屹从头到尾没有跟她说过一句我的坏话,她也说
她不怪我,他们都觉得我是好女孩,她说的这些让我很高兴。我最愧疚的人就是她了。
她说我要出来说一下,我答应了。后来她可能考虑了一下说双方不回应对这件事情的平
息更好
,我答应了,

相信第一句红字的,可以相信崔屹是天下第一大情种

相信第二句红字的,可以相信崔屹的老婆是圣母玛丽亚

但是考虑到情种和圣母在过去的一年里都拒绝扶养这个孩子

我宁愿相信这段花言巧语的目的是为了绿色的一句。

hahaha, totally agree! 
头像
0操作128 #
头像
128 #
0
07-01-19 15:29操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用greenflower在2007-1-19 15:26:00的发言:

[em12]

所以孩子自己的要看好, 可别让什么衣冠的什么给骗了.

[em02]
头像
0操作129 #
头像
129 #
0
07-01-19 15:29操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用datrickykid在2007-1-19 15:21:00的发言:

Come on, what happened between Cui and this girl is statutory rape... He had sex with this girl before she even turned 18... Did this girl hold up a gun to force Cui to have sex with her?  I don't understand why so many females are so hateful towards this girl.  Yes, she did do something wrong when she was 17, but Cui, an adult who was completely competent to make his decision had sex with this girl before she was even an adult...  Also, what's wrong for this girl to fight for child support?  If Cui had been paying child support and this girl is still doing this on the BBS, then maybe she really wanted more than just child support.  Nonetheless, Cui is lucky that the girl didn't sue him when this first happened (she probably had no idea there's law like this), now he's probably trying to drag this as long as possible so that it would pass the 3 yr statue of limitation.   

statutory rape need the girl to be <=16
头像
0操作130 #
头像
130 #
0
07-01-19 15:31操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用kittypeny在2007-1-19 15:29:00的发言:

statutory rape need the girl to be <=16

You are wrong!  In California statutory rape, or ‘unlawful sexual intercourse,’ is: “an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person who is not the spouse of the perpetrator, if the person is a minor. . . . [A] ‘minor’ is a person under the age of 18 years.” Cal. Pen. Code § 261.5(a).

Advertisement
头像
0操作131 #
头像
131 #
0
07-01-19 15:31操作
只看TAAA分享
deleted. Just wish they settled with a good solution,

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-21 0:42:38编辑过]

头像
0操作132 #
头像
132 #
0
07-01-19 15:32操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用datrickykid在2007-1-19 15:31:00的发言:

You are wrong!  In California statutory rape, or ‘unlawful sexual intercourse,’ is: “an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person who is not the spouse of the perpetrator, if the person is a minor. . . . [A] ‘minor’ is a person under the age of 18 years.” Cal. Pen. Code § 261.5(a).

guess the law is diff between east and west coast then

but anyone proved the girl was <18 at the time?

头像
0操作133 #
头像
133 #
0
07-01-19 15:32操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用cloudymind在2007-1-19 15:23:00的发言:

不过小姐姐(就是崔屹的妻子)给我打了电话,她很
关心我和孩子跟我说了非常多,她说崔屹从头到尾没有跟她说过一句我的坏话,她也说
她不怪我,他们都觉得我是好女孩,她说的这些让我很高兴。我最愧疚的人就是她了。
她说我要出来说一下,我答应了。后来她可能考虑了一下说双方不回应对这件事情的平
息更好
,我答应了,

相信第一句红字的,可以相信崔屹是天下第一大情种

相信第二句红字的,可以相信崔屹的老婆是圣母玛丽亚

但是考虑到情种和圣母在过去的一年里都拒绝扶养这个孩子

我宁愿相信这段花言巧语的目的是为了绿色的一句。

I have to agree with this.  

The poor little girl. If she is really that terrible as some ppl say here, she would have sued him when this thing happened at the first time.   But she did not and she probably still had some hope at that time.   Now what she is doing is just for the child support. 

And when all those things happened, she was about 17/18.  Think of a girl of that age being alone here in a totally different country,  She probably was dreaming of so called love.  I feel really sorry that so many people describe her as a terrible woman.

头像
0操作134 #
头像
134 #
0
07-01-19 15:34操作
只看TAAA分享

yes, dream about love all you want

get a single man

dont dream about someone's husband!!

头像
0操作135 #
头像
135 #
0
07-01-19 15:35操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用rufers在2007-1-19 15:32:00的发言:

I have to agree with this.  

The poor little girl. If she is really that terrible as some ppl say here, she would have sued him when this thing happened at the first time.   But she did not and she probably still had some hope at that time.   Now what she is doing is just for the child support. 

And when all those things happened, she was about 17/18.  Think of a girl of that age being alone here in a totally different country,  She probably was dreaming of so called love.  I feel really sorry that so many people describe her as a terrible woman.

dreaming of love from a married man is WRONG.  Periond.[em12]
Advertisement
头像
0操作136 #
头像
136 #
0
07-01-19 15:40操作
只看TAAA分享

I am trying to say.  What she is doing now is right.   What she did is wrong, that is for sure.

People are so focused on what she did.   But nobody support her for what she is doing now? 

The person that should be blamed more is the guy, not the girl.  Think of the age difference of these two.

Why people blame women in these cases. MIT blames the wife and people here blames the girl.

头像
0操作137 #
头像
137 #
0
07-01-19 15:44操作
只看TAAA分享

suing him for child support is right

but spreading rumors online is meaningless

the guy who posted the original post, was crazy, since he seems to support neither side-- and bad mouthed everyone

头像
0操作138 #
头像
138 #
0
07-01-19 15:50操作
只看TAAA分享
He was trying to get some 舆论 support, I think.
头像
0操作139 #
头像
139 #
0
07-01-19 16:01操作
只看TAAA分享

even if he gets the 舆论 support he wants, 1 it will almost surely ruin Cui's life, as well as Cui's wife and child's

2 it will not help the girl, since 舆论 is not the law and 舆论 certainly does not pay a penny for her child support

and obviously with what the girl did (which is wrong), he is not getting the support

头像
0操作140 #
头像
140 #
0
07-01-19 16:02操作
只看TAAA分享
以下是引用ConnieBear在2007-1-19 15:26:00的发言:

and what's wrong with that? a 17 or 19 year old should be sane enough to decide who to sleep with, right?

I thought I was the only person with this opinion until saw some discussion here. I was kind of upset that I have totally different opinion with others.


[em11]
发帖回复
查看:69128|回复:306
Advertisement
打开收藏板块打开个人中心
边缘侧滑返回