http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Banking/Homebuyingguide/P72074.asp
The classic formulas for mortgage affordability could lead you to disaster. Here’s how to get a better handle on what you really can afford.
By Liz Pulliam Weston
Thirty years ago, first-time home buyers were often encouraged to stretch as far as they possibly could to buy a house. Back then, that advice made some sense.
Today, it can be a recipe for disaster.
A too-big house payment can, at the very least, leave you with too little money for other goals: retirement, vacations, college funds for the kids. At worst, it can leave you vulnerable to foreclosure and bankruptcy.
What’s more, you can’t count on your real estate agent, a mortgage loan officer, your friends and family or an Internet calculator to know what you can really afford. That’s a decision you have to make yourself after reviewing your finances, your future obligations, your goals and your gut.
Yet many first-time buyers are still being pushed into mortgages that are bigger than they can handle, based on old-fashioned advice.
Here’s what’s changed in the 30 years (or more) since your parents bought their first house:
- Inflation. Rapidly rising prices in the 1970s and early 1980s meant you could count on hefty annual raises. Today, you can’t rely on double-digit income boosts to make your mortgage payment less of a burden each year.
- Two-income couples. A generation ago, single-income families were more common. If the breadwinner lost a job, the other spouse could go to work to save the house. With more two-income families needing both paychecks to make the mortgage payment, there’s no one on the sidelines to take up the slack -- unless you put the kids to work.
- The lending industry. Thirty years ago, it was pretty tough to get a mortgage for more than you could really afford. Today, it’s fairly commonplace. More lenders have loosened their criteria, knowing that the vast majority of their borrowers will do whatever it takes to pay their mortgage -- even if it means trashing the rest of their financial lives.
- Retirement. A much bigger proportion of the workforce was covered by traditional, defined-benefit pensions 30 years ago -- which means they didn’t have to save massive amounts of money on their own to have a decent retirement. Today, the onus is typically on you to carve enough out of your budget to fund 401(k)s and IRAs.
Let’s get real
So how much should you spend on a house? The traditional way to calculate that is to add up all your income and make sure that your housing expenses -- mortgage payment, homeowners insurance and property taxes -- don’t exceed a certain amount of that total. The traditional limit, still used by many lenders, is 28% of gross monthly income. Some financial advisers recommend capping your outlay at 25%; others suggest stretching to 33% or more.
These limits, by the way, apply only if you don’t have a lot of other debt. Most lenders don’t want more than 36% of your total income to go toward mortgage and other debt payments. If your total debt would push you over that figure, most lenders will reduce the size of the mortgage for which you qualify.
Here’s how the varying limits translate. The figures assume you earn $45,000 a year and that you would pay $480 in homeowners insurance and $2,000 in property taxes annually. (In reality, those figures would fluctuate with the value of the home you buy.) This also assumes a 30-year loan at 5.5% interest and a big enough down payment that you’ll avoid private mortgage insurance, or PMI.
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-15 17:13:21编辑过]